Showing posts with label Sam's Posts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sam's Posts. Show all posts

On television, a ballistics expert places two bullets under a microscope, slowly rotates one of them and markings line up perfectly, showing conclusively that the bullets were fired from the same gun.

In real life, a ballistics expert places one bullet and one fragment of lead under a microscope, slowly rotates one of them and … bumpkis. There aren’t enough grooves left on the fragment to make a match. Or, the grooves look sort of the same, but it’s just not close enough to say with 100-percent certainty that they match.

Like other TV science, the truth is a little more complicated than the fantasy.

Guns, except shotguns and muskets, are “rifled,” meaning they have a series of grooves cut into the interior of the barrels. The spaces between the grooves are called lands. Those grooves and lands spiral from the chamber, where the fresh cartridge is inserted, to the muzzle, where the fired bullet exits the barrel. The grooves and lands grip the bullet and the spiral causes it to spin like a perfect football pass, improving accuracy of the gun. Shot barrels don’t have rifling because they are designed to fire rounds containing multiple small projectiles and rifling would have no effect.

Tools used in the manufacture of guns leave unique markings on the rifling that are transferred to bullets when they are fired from the gun and theoretically make it possible for experts to identify the gun from which a bullet was fired. I say theoretically because it doesn’t always work out that way.

In the case of Blister and T.J. Cook's murders outlined in my book Precious Blood, the experts were able only to make one of those “sort-of” matches. Three bullets were fired during the robbery – two into 4-year-old T.J.’s chest and one into his father’s head. But of the three, one bullet was missing and one was shattered into tiny fragments. When ballistics experts at the state crime lab first examined the bullets – before the murder weapon was found – they could say only that the one intact bullet was fired from a gun with six grooves and lands and a right-hand twist. The pattern matched 109 different models of rifles, revolvers or semi-automatics. Once the murder weapon was recovered from the Kentucky River, additional tests still did not show conclusively that bullets from the murder scene were fired from the same gun, only that they were consistent with test rounds fired in the lab.

Other tests are also being revealed as less accurate than originally advertised. In comparative lead analysis – which was used only at the FBI lab – scientists compared the chemical composition of bullets under the flawed assumption that no two batches of bullets manufactured would have the exact same composition. News stories recently surfaced showing that a top analyst at the FBI crime lab have known for years that comparative lead analysis was inaccurate, even though the analysis wasn’t stopped until 2005. The agency has still not notified the lawyers of the people convicted on the strength of that testing that the analysis was flawed.

The point isn’t that such methods don’t have a place in police work – they do. But they should be used as pointers toward more evidence, not as the only evidence.

By relying too heavily on comparative lead analysis as evidence, prosecutors have now put more than 2,500 convictions in jeopardy. Some and perhaps all of those 2,500 convicts are surely guilty, but now they stand to be released back onto the streets because of an over-reliance on technology that had been hyped as an infallible method of assessing and assigning guilt.

As disturbing as the release of those murderers back into society is, some of those convicted may be innocent. In a society that prides itself in justice, the conviction and imprisonment of an innocent person based on TV science is a true tragedy.

Sphere: Related Content
read more “TV science an injustice for all”

A spectator crime

November 1, 2007

Sometimes a community buries a murder so deep that the people who live there forget what really happened, or even that anything happened at all.

Like Leonard Wood’s mutilated body, the facts surrounding his murder are buried so deeply that few people in Letcher County, Kentucky, know the atrocity took place. Even his name is not sure, with some reports calling him Leonard Wood and some calling him Leonard Woods. But Wood’s murder was so outrageous and his subsequent mutilation so horrendous that it made national news in a time when there was no television and precious little radio.


And still a community forgot. But then, Leonard Wood wasn’t that important.

He was only a black man.

With the so-called Jena 6 incident in the news, the imagery of the noose has made a comeback in America. The six black high school students in Jena, La., were arrested for the beating of a white student after nooses were found hanging in a tree on campus that blacks had dared to sit under. Since then, a black professor at Columbia University in New York found a noose hanging on her door. A Brooklyn high school principal received a package in the mail that contained a noose. A statue of rapper Tupac Shakur in Georgia was vandalized and draped with a noose.

The noose is a powerful symbol of racism, but in today’s world the concept of a noose may seem abstract. In Leonard Wood's day, there was nothing abstract about it. A noose was an ever-present threat. More than 4,700 lynchings of blacks have been documented in the United States, a figure that includes mutilations as well as killings. There were 16 deaths by lynching in 1927 alone. Wood was one of the victims, but even though his murder was well documented in newspaper stories and in at least one photograph, people in the very town where Wood's lynching began are often surprised to hear about it.

I had heard for years that there had been a lynching, but when I mentioned it to other people, most had not heard of it.

I had never taken the time to look up the specifics until recently, but an article caught my attention and prompted me to learn more. Benjamin Luntz, a native of the area whose family was historically at odds with the Ku Klux Klan, wrote a long article in a historical society newsletter called The Appalachian Quarterly in March 2004, and included reprints of several newspaper articles of the day. That led me to search for others.

The events that led to Wood’s murder and mutilation began on November 27, 1927, in the coal company town of Jenkins, Ky., five miles from the Virginia state line. In the decades following the murder, rumors developed that Wood had raped and killed a white woman – an unforgivable crime in the segregated South. In reality, Wood's crime had nothing to do with rape, and nothing to do with a white woman.

Wood became a wanted man for the murder of a white mine foreman. Though no one disputes that the foreman was shot, the circumstances surrounding his death probably will never be absolutely determined.

It was a Sunday night, long after dark, and Hershal Deaton was driving from his home in Coeburn, Va., back to his job site in Fleming, Ky. W.M. Townsley and Ernest Jordan were riding in the coupe with him. Townsley and Jordan told police that a black man and two black women stopped the car on the road from Jenkins to Fleming, another coal camp. The three supposedly asked for a ride. According to the two passengers, Deaton refused them, telling them it wasn’t a taxi and there wasn’t enough room for them. When he did, the witnesses claimed, the women jumped onto the running boards and back of the car and refused to get off. Deaton got out of the car to make them get off. Then, the passengers said, one of the women handed a gun to the man with them and he killed Deaton.

No one seemed to question why three African Americans, two of them women, would climb on a car carrying three white men in 1927, but the story seems highly suspect. Whatever the real reason behind the altercation, police bought Deaton’s passengers’ story, as did most members of the community.

The articles suggest nothing other than Wood’s guilt, and an editorial in The Mountain Eagle newspaper following the lynching opines that if the editor had sat on a jury judging Wood, he would have found him guilty. But, the editorial added, “There is no justification for mob law.”

Though Townsley and Jordan gave only a description of the three people, police later that night identified them as Wood, a Jenkins coal miner, and Susan Arminster and Anna May Emory, both of the Slick Rock section of the city.

Jenkins Police arrested Wood and the two women the next day and placed them in the town jail. Jenkins was at the time wholly owned by Consolidation Coal Co. of Cumberland, Md., the largest bituminous coal company in the country. The streets belonged to the company, the homes belonged to the company, the jail belonged to the company, and the police chief belonged to the company. Word soon reached the chief that a mob was gathering to avenge Deaton’s death. Chief Sam Privitt ordered Wood taken to Whitesburg, the county seat, and placed in the Letcher County Jail. The county jail at the time was a two-story stone dungeon with a tower and unglazed windows secured with steel bars. A high wrought-iron fence surrounded it. A mob might still get Wood, but it wouldn’t tear up company property doing it.

Wood and the women arrived safely at the jail, and stayed the night of November 28 under the watchful eye of a deputy jailer. The jailer, who inherited the office when her husband died in a car crash, was out of town to attend her father’s funeral and returned the next day, just in time for the … festivities.

Once again, the story goes, word arrived that a mob was on its way. Sheriff Morgan T. Reynolds later swore under oath that he had been out of town collecting taxes, and only learned of the mob’s plans a short time before it arrived. He testified that he got the jailer and her children out of their residence in the back of the jail and went across the street to his office in the courthouse to get handcuffs, intending to transfer Wood to safety. Reynolds said he was still in the office when a deputy told him it was too late. A crowd was already assembling between the courthouse and the jail. Estimates at the time placed the crowed at 200 to 300 men and women. The sheriff, an elected official who in that day would have campaigned door to door, swore under oath that he didn’t recognize any of them, though few wore masks. He refused them the keys to the jail, but the crowd was undeterred. The Mountain Eagle two days later said Reynolds was “overpowered,” he makes no mention of any physical confrontation in his statement, saying only that he “asked” the crowd to stop and they refused.

For an hour, the mob went at the locks of the jail with bullets, hammers and hack saws before some of the men were finally able to break in. Some accounts say some of the men climbed to the roof and tore a hole in it. Others say they sawed through the bars of a second-story window. However they got in, once inside, they sawed through the bars inside and removed Wood and the two women.

What happened then is also in dispute. Some reports say the women were whipped, some make no mention of it. All accounts say that Wood took full blame for the killing and the mob sent the women back into the jail. Woods was not so lucky. He was dragged about by a set of trace chains wrapped around his neck, then shoved into a car and the procession of vehicles left Whitesburg with a volley of gunfire.

The cars went first to Jenkins, where the men attempted to lynch Wood by tying him between the bumpers of two cars. First reports were that the crowd had taken Police Chief Privitt with them “for protection,” and that when the lynching began, he talked them out of lynching Wood in town. The Coalfield Progress in Norton, Va., reported that Privitt told the mob it would cause problems for the company because it had a large number of black employees. The newspaper later retracted that story after the chief and company officials complained. The second story told how Privitt had bravely stood up to the murderous mob and thought he had saved Wood's life. Apparently it didn’t occur to him that Wood was not out of danger when the mob carted him off to the Virginia state line, just outside of town.

Kentucky and Virginia had built a reviewing stand there to celebrate the opening of the new federal highway barely a week before. The stand was in Virginia, but the steps apparently led up from Kentucky. It was from that stand that the mob erected a makeshift gallows and hanged Wood. A crowd estimated at 500 had gathered for the hanging, and as Wood dangled from the rope many in that crowd stepped back into Kentucky and began shooting at the dying man. An estimated 100 bullets hit him and cut the rope, causing him to fall onto the platform below. Leaders of the mob, then obtained a can of gasoline from a woman in the crowd, doused the body and set it on fire.

A book called Without Sanctuary: Lynching Photography in America includes a photo of Wood’s corpse lying on the platform, surrounded by whites. Though his body does not yet appear mutilated, and there is no sign of blood or burns on the wood reviewing stand, the photo appears to have been taken in daylight. Wood was taken from the jail around 11 p.m., and the crime allegedly occurred during the night. At least 18 people, including what appear to be one woman and one teenage boy, are visible in the photo, the boy hanging over the rail of the reviewing stand to see the corpse. The same photo and a short account of the lynching are included in a Managing White Supremacy: Race, Politics, and Citizenship in Jim Crow Virginia By J. Douglas Smith

While most evidence points to the lynching itself occurring in Virginia, the governors of Virginia and Kentucky argued for days over that point. Kentucky officials claimed that the plot was hatched at Deaton’s funeral in Coeburn, Va., on the morning of the lynching and that few Kentuckians were involved. They also claimed the lynching took place in Virginia, and that Virginia should have been responsible for prosecuting members of the mob for murder. Virginia claimed that most of the mob came from Kentucky, and that the lynching occurred on Kentucky soil. Letcher Commonwealth’s Attorney Henry Moore investigated the incident from his office in Whitesburg. Though he claimed to know the probable identities of several of the people involved in the lynching, I could find no record that anyone was ever prosecuted.

A judge in Whitesburg released Susan Armister and Anna May Emory the next Monday after an examining trial. The Mountain Eagle reported on Dec. 8, 1927, that the two testified they had seen Wood kill Deaton, but had not participated in the crime. The judge apparently believed them over Deaton’s passengers' statements that one of the women had given the gun to Wood. Despite that inconsistency, he questioned no other part of the men's stories. What really happened on that gravel road and on the mountain above it two days later will never be known.

Despite the obvious participation by some county residents, the national attention and the subsequent investigation was apparently enough to dampen the spirits of other would-be vigilantes. Though there are reports of a white man being lynched in the same county in 1883 and an unnamed black man in 1901, the Leonard Wood lynching was the last ever reported here.

Sphere: Related Content
read more “A spectator crime”



The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday granted a stay of execution to a Mississippi murderer pending the outcome of a Kentucky case now before the court.

The court delayed the execution by lethal injection of Earl W. Berry until it can hear an appeal by Ralph Baze next spring. The stay is expected to put other executions in limbo until the Baze case can be heard.

Baze's case questions the method used to determine whether the combination of drugs used in lethal injection amounts to cruel and unusual punishment. Three drugs are used in lethal injection. The first is an anesthesia; the second is a muscle relaxer used to stop breathing, and the third stops the heart. Death penalty opponents claim that the first two drugs paralyze the prisoners rather than knocking them out, giving a false impression of serenity while they suffocate slowly, and painfully. Various judges have set varying standards for ruling that punishment is cruel and unusual, ranging from the "unnecessary risk" to "wanton infliction of pain." Baze is asking the high court to pick one standard

Berry, convicted in the 1987 beating death of 56-year-old Mary Bounds, has been on death row for 19 years and has exhausted most of his appeals. His attorneys filed a motion challenging the death penalty on October 18, 11 days before his scheduled execution. The Supreme Court did not stop the execution based on Berry's appeal, but on the fact that the Baze case was still before it

Baze was convicted in 1994 in the deaths of Powell County, Ky., Sheriff Steve Bennett and Deputy Sheriff Arthur Briscoe. The two officers were attempting to serve an out-of-state warrant on Baze when he opened fire on them from his house with an assault rifle. The murders occurred January 30, 1992.

Sphere: Related Content
read more “Lethal injection halted pending review”

This is more related to true stupidity than true crime, but I thought readers might be interested in the lengths to which some companies will go to protect their profits. Sam Adams Beer is threatening to sue because of a web site named samadamsformayor.com. I've written more about it on my personal blog (Sam Adams pictured left).

Sphere: Related Content
read more “OT Post: Beer company threatens lawsuit over Sam Adams's name”

The trial judge will rule on an appeal by confessed killer Jerome Boggs after the Kentucky Chief Justice declined to rule on whether the judge should step down.

Boggs pleaded guilty in 2002 to murdering Timothy "Blister" Cook and his four-year-old son T.J. in their home in Whitesburg, Kentucky. I wrote about the case in my book Precious Blood, which was published in April by Pinnacle Books.

Though he agreed not to appeal, Boggs did just that, claiming ineffective assistance of counsel. He also asked that Letcher Circuit Judge Samuel T. Wright be removed from the case.

Wright, the trial judge, asked Chief Justice Joseph E. Lambert to make the decision on whether he should remain on the case. Lambert declined to rule, citing past precedent. That means Wright will rule on the entire appeal. Letcher Commonwealth's Attorney Edison Banks has filed a motion for dismissal.

Meanwhile, Boggs has been moved from the Green River Correctional Complex at Central City where he was sent in December 2002 to serve two life sentences. He is now incarcerated at the Little Sandy Correctional Complex in Sandy Hook, about 220 miles closer to his home. Both prisons are medium security institutions, but Little Sandy is the state's newest prison and is considered its most technologically advanced. There have been a number of transfers from Green River to Little Sandy, so Boggs' move was apparently not unusual.

The family of the victims had objected to Boggs being placed in Green River becaused they considered it to be too easy for him. This despite the unfortunate coincidence that the Green River warden is named Doom.

April Banks, who was married to Jerome Boggs when the crimes were committed but later divorced him, was convicted of facilitation to the murders. She is in the Otter Creek Correctional Center, a privately run prison in Wheelwright. She is scheduled to serve out her sentence in 2008.

Blister and T.J. Cook were found shot to death in their home in West Whitesburg on February 17, 2002. The Boggses were arrested four days later.

Police say April Boggs dropped her husband off on the main highway, then picked him up 20 minutes later. In the interim, Jerome Boggs shot Blister Cook once in the back of the head with a .22-caliber revolver, and shot T.J. Cook twice in the chest at point-blank range. He then stole about $1,000 in cash and two bags of marijuana. The crime was made more horrendous because the couple rented a motel room across the river from the murder scene. A motel employee testified that when she was called to the room to check the heat, the two were eating pizza and drinking beer as they sat on the couch and watched the investigation through the motel window.

Sphere: Related Content
read more “Trial judge to decide Boggs appeal”

Becoming (in)famous

August 1, 2007

By Sam Adams

Driving to work, you turn on the radio and the morning drive-time guy with the perky voice is interviewing your favorite true-crime author. Ever wonder how that author ever got noticed?

So does Jack Pattie, and he is the morning drive-time guy with the perky voice.

Jack (pictured above interviewing me about Precious Blood) is the host of the aptly named Jack Pattie Show on WVLK-AM 590 in Lexington, Kentucky, and does a segment every week called Forensic Fridays, during which he interviews a true crime author or a prosecutor.

He called me last week to vent and to suggest rather pointedly that I ask the question that I posed above: "How does a true crime author ever get noticed?"

"I'm just amazed at how little publishers who publish true crime books care about publicity for their authors," Jack groused. He had six books sitting on his desk from six different authors, all of whom he wanted to inteview for his show. The publisher hadn't helped him contact any of them, and in fact told him they didn't even have contact information for one of the authors.

Since I haven't had the free time during business hours to contact the publicist whom Jack termed "an arrogant little s**t," I won't use the name here, but suffice it to say that Jack -- a pretty jolly kinda guy -- is not chuckling about the reception his free publicity offer is getting in New York publishing houses. Thankfully he was fairly satisfied with my publisher, Kensington Books, so I don't have to bite the hand that signs my own royalty checks, but there were others that he royally ripped. In fact, he is to the point that he won't deal with St. Martin's at all, and he about drop some others as well.

A word of warning to publishers: Jack Pattie isn't just the most popular talk show host on the most popular talk radio station in a city of 270,000 people; he's a member in good standing of The Amalgamated Order of Real Bearded Santas. Publicists take heed. This guy could really mess with your Christmas. Think stocking and coal. Kentucky has lots of coal.

Jack is a real fan of true crime, and he says he's not going to abandon authors, even if their publishers have. He urged the authors to contact him directly and bypass their publicists. True crime writers who want to do that can email him at WVLK, or contact him through the radio station's web site.

Sphere: Related Content
read more “Becoming (in)famous”

Vindication

July 28, 2007

My father volunteered for the Army twice, serving during the Occupation of Japan and the Korean War. In his retirement years, he worked tirelessly as a volunteer service officer for the DAV to help disabled vets obtain the benefits due them. This disclaimer is in no way intended to apologize or explain this post. It is written to make it crystal clear to the chickenhawks that populate the blogosphere that they have not cornered the market in respect for soldiers.

Less than a week after conservative blogs flogged In Cold Blog founder Corey Mitchell for a post titled "Killitary," a presidential panel led by former Senator Bob Dole (pictured above, left) and former Health and Human Services Secretary Donna Shalala has reached some of the same conclusions as Mitchell -- namely that the government does a shameful job of caring for veterans.

Though Dole, a Republican, and Shalala, a Democrat, didn't make a connection between military training and the creation of serial killers, which Mitchell did, the idea is not farfetched. The report from the presidential commission says in part that the military fails to provide adequate mental health care, and that the Congress should enact legislation ensuring that treatment for post traumatic stress disorder is available to all soldiers who have been deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan.

The thrust of Mitchell's piece was that the military has made a concerted effort since World Ward II to turn U.S. soldiers into better killers, but has made little or no effort to reverse the process once they are discharged from service. The commission's findings back that up, and a lawsuit filed Monday by veterans against the Department of Veteran Affairs goes even further.

That class-action lawsuit alleges that Veterans Affairs and the Pentagon have purposefully misclassified cases of PTSD as a pre-existing personality disorder in an effort to avoid paying benefits. The Pentagon has denied the accusations in the suit. Its own reports show that 38 percent of soldiers and 50 percent of guardsmen returning home from Iraq and Afghanistan suffer from mental health problems. Critics say the number is possibly much higher, but is hidden by the classification of some disorders as pre-existing. Even if the Pentagon's numbers are correct, it is still a huge percentage of veterans suffering from mental disorders and should point up the necessity of a better system to identify and treat these service men and women.

Instead, mentally ill soldiers and Marines are returned to active duty or kicked out without the medical attention they need. CNN, in a televised report on Wednesday, interviewed one Iraq war veteran who was allowed to reenlist after signing an affidavit saying he no longer wanted to kill himself. He was eventually discharged for a "pre-existing personality disorder." The report apparently was not placed on the CNN website. The family of another veteran, Marine Lance Corporal Jeffrey Lucey, on Thursday filed suit against the VA and its secretary, Jim Nicholson, for what they say was the agency's failure to provide mental health care for Lucey. The 23-year-old vet hanged himself after being turned away from a VA hospital where he sought treatment for PTSD.

Not all soldiers returning from Iraq and Afghanistan will kill themselves or someone else, but a significant number have or will. Rather than stoning the messenger, truly patriotic Americans need to do something to see that troops like Lucey aren't forgotten. They need to demand that the military provide mental health services to all soldiers and Marines at the time of their discharge so they do not become dangers to themselves or others. The system we have today is no system at all, and that is shameful. It needs to be changed.

Sphere: Related Content
read more “Vindication”

By Sam Adams

Blister and T.J Cook’s family wanted their killer to die. They wanted to hear the jury recommend the death sentence, and the wanted the judge to pass it.

But they gave up the chance for that to happen. The prosecutor told them that if the case went to trial, Jerome Boggs (pictured left) would almost assuredly be found guilty, and if he was, he would be sentenced to die. But he also told them that if Boggs were sentenced to death, he would be granted an automatic appeal and those appeals would continue for years. Boggs, the man who pulled the trigger on a father and his four-year-old son, was just as likely to die of old age as from lethal injection. And in during those years, the family of the victims would be subjected at least once and perhaps many times to the grisly pictures of their son and grandson, brother and nephew, in death.

These were not the pictures the family planned to show during sentencing. It was the not the photo of T.J. in his suit or Tim, known as Blister to his friends, in his Army uniform. It wasn’t even the picture of the two in repose in a single casket, both in their leather jackets and white shirts, T.J. Tucked securely in his father’s eternal embrace. The pictures they would endure would be of Blister slumped against the front of his couch with blood running across his pale face, and of little, innocent T.J. lying on the floor of his bedroom, his hands by his sides and the front of his gray sweatshirt soaked in blood from the two bullet wounds in his chest.

The family had endured enough. They wanted Jerome Boggs to die, but child killers often die in prison – even if it has to be at the hands of other prisoners. They signed the bottom of the plea agreement and allowed the man who took away their own precious blood to spend the rest of his life in prison.

In exchange for this mercy, Jerome Boggs would plead guilty and agree not to contest the sentence. Boggs signed the agreement, and told the judge in open court that he understood it, that he had been well represented, and that he gave up all rights to appeal.

For three years, the Cook family grieved and healed, at least somewhat consoled in the fact that Jerome’s wife, April, was convicted of facilitation to the crime and sent to prison for 14 years. Jerome was still alive, but he was out of their lives forever. When I first began writing about the murders of Blister and T.J. in Precious Blood, I thought the Cook family was right. The case was closed; the killer and his accomplice were punished.

But in February of 2005, Jerome Boggs did what he had promised he would not do. He filed an appeal claiming ineffective assistance of counsel, basically saying that his court-appointed attorneys had not done enough to help in. In effect, the appeal said that the two veteran death-penalty lawyers had betrayed him.

The appeal was filed well after the deadline set out in the law, but oddly enough it was dated before the expiration of the deadline. The motion, which on its face seemed ludicrous, was filed with the court, and to everyone’s surprise, it was not immediately dismissed. Instead, it hung like a weight over the heads of the victims, the police and the prosecutor. Once again, Boggs had entered the lives and the minds of his victims’ family, and it looked as though he would be there for a long time to come.

The story ended there in Precious Blood, but now there is another chapter in the case.

The motion hung in limbo for 16 months with no action of any kind by the court, but the judge has now decided to move ahead. The judge set a new hearing for motion hour on July 11. The murderer who promised never to darken the door of the courthouse again will get another day in court. It’s just not the day he had hoped for.

Instead of hearing his motion for a new trial, Letcher Circuit Judge Sam Wright will hear a motion from Commonwealth’s Attorney Edison Banks to dismiss the appeal.

It is now up to the court to see that a killer is bound by his word.

Sphere: Related Content
read more “Promises of a Killer”

The Lexington Herald-Leader in Kentucky is reporting that Clay City Police Chief Randy Lacy was killed with his own gun.

Lacy had two gun in the car. His sidearm was still in its holster, and the bullet that killed him was fired from behind the security screen that separates the front and back seats. Officials have not determined how the shooter got hold of the second gun, but surmised that it might have fallen under the seat of the Lacy's cruiser.

Police have charged James Barnett with the killing. Barnett, who has a long history of drug and alcohol arrests, was being taken to jail in the back seat of Lacy's cruiser. Police said his hands handcuffed in front of him rather than behind.

A veteran police officer told me today that while it is not advisable to handcuff a suspect's hands in front, small-town and rural officers often do so with people they know or others that they feel present little threat. He cited an instance only last week in which he did the same thing in arresting a 70-year-old man. The same officer said many years ago, he sometimes arrested the same people so many times that he started telling them to get in the car without frisking them, handcuffing them or touching them at all.

Sphere: Related Content
read more “Police Chief Randy Lacy Shot with His Own Gun”

Clay City, Kentucky, Police Chief Randy Lacy was on a call that should have resulted in a routine arrest and a night in jail for a drunk driver.

Instead, it resulted in a bullet in the back of the head for the 55-year-old police chief.

A passerby on Wednesday noticed a police car crashed into a sign post and stopped to investigate. He found another police officer holding a man face down on the ground and holding a blackjack. The chief was inside the car, slumped over the wheel and covered in blood.

According to police, Lacy had gone to answer a complaint of a drunk driver in the Clay City bottoms area of the town. He arrested James H. Barnett, 37, and was apparently taking him to jail in the back of his cruiser. Police have so far not released details of how Barnett could have obtained a gun in the back of the cruiser, but Kentucky State Police (shown in the Herald-Leader photo investigating the shooting) said for some reason the 22-year veteran police officer had handcuffed the man's hands in front of him. Standard procedure is to handcuff suspects' hands behind them to prevent them from using them to attack an officer or escape.

The Herald-Leader in Lexington reported that Barnett had been arrested more than 30 times, many of them on drug and alcohol charges. He was convicted in 1994 of aggravated assault on a police officer and was sentenced to two-years conditional release.

Lacy came from a family of police officers and served on several departments in Powell County. He was appointed police chief of Clay City three years ago, the second time he had served in that position.

Sphere: Related Content
read more “Police chief murdered in Kentucky”

By Sam Adams

The Virginia Tech Shooter. The Washington Sniper. The Baseline Killer.

Mass murders and serial killings are shocking and frightening. The sheer volume of killings draws the attention of the media, and of the public. But are you really at risk?

Not necessarily. Most murders are committed by someone who knows the victim -- a friend, a family member, a boyfriend or girlfriend. People who live in rural areas are safer than those who live in large cities. Whites are safer than African Americans. Both killers and victims are overwhelmingly male.

In Kentucky, where I live, most murders are over property or some personal dispute. Serial killings are rare, as are stranger murders of all kinds.

Serial killers grab the headlines, and it often seems as though you take your life in your hands when you leave your home. But the bottom line is that serial killers and mass murderers are aberrations.

The person behind you in the grocery line is much less likely to kill you than is the person in the next cubical at work or person across the table at breakfast. The killer you have to worry about is not the stranger in the clock tower. The killer you have to worry about is the killer you know.

Sphere: Related Content
read more “The Killer You Know”

In Cold Blog is a true crime blog founded by best selling author Corey Mitchell, and is written by award winning journalists, authors, criminal justice professionals and others.

Click to...

Join Our Fan Page on Facebook!

Site Archive

Share Us With Friends!

Subscribe


Subscribe to Our Feed

Follow us on Twitter

Get New ICB Posts by Email:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Today's Featured News & Posts

Our Recent Articles

Blogumulus by Roy Tanck and Amanda FazaniDistributed by CahayaBiru.com
.
.