Showing posts with label Matt's Posts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Matt's Posts. Show all posts

Wrestling Evil

October 23, 2009

By M. William Phelps

On July 7, 2009, M. William Phelps’s tenth true-crime book, CRUEL DEATH, drops. It is the story of thrill killers Erika and Benjamin “BJ” Sifrit, those snake-loving, Xanax- and cocaine-snorting Hitler fans who committed one of the most heinous crimes of the past ten years.

The following is an expanded version of the book Author’s Note.



Throughout my years of writing true-crime, I’ve always drifted away from the more gruesome cases. Granted, every murder is an act of evil; every untimely death a tragedy. But I have not waded in terribly bloody waters, if you will excuse my frankness. I have generally written about those murders we tend not to cringe at—those deaths which have been quick and (God willing for the victims) painless.

That being said, as I began work on CRUEL DEATH, I knew it would involve a certain amount of horror I had not yet covered: the brutal dismemberment of two human beings. What I didn’t know was that this act of savagery by the killers was only the beginning. What I uncovered while researching and writing this book—some of which has not been yet reported—affected me in ways I had never experienced, in all of my years reporting on murder. There were times when I had to leave the book alone for a day or two to catch my breath and think about things. Now and then, as you write these books day in and day out, you can get caught up to a point where some of what you’re doing doesn’t seem real. Yes, I used dozens of interviews, thousands of pages of court records, trial transcripts, photographs, police reports, military reports, depositions, interviews with the perpetrators, and scores of other documents to write this book, a process of which becomes, at times, like putting together the pieces of a puzzle. But here, within the pathos of this case, the way the victims were treated before, during and (especially) after death was so profoundly evil and cruel—there are not enough adjectives in the English language to describe the treatment these victims endured—that as I wrote about it, a part of me began to drift into a despair I had never experienced while writing true-crime. It made for an incredibly bumpy road—emotionally. There were days when I had to put this project aside, due to the graphic nature of what I had uncovered, and work on something else. There were also days when I thought I could not go back to it.

I have never written—or read—true-crime for its shock value. To me, the process has always been about exploring the lives of people, telling the victim’s side of the story, and getting to the core of what makes murderers do the incredibly evil things they do. My goal is always to tell the most complete, unreported story I can find. In addition, I search for those stories I believe need to be told. With that being said, part of my hope in publishing CRUEL DEATH is that readers get the metaphor I feel is entirely implicit throughout the book: that the people we meet throughout an average day—passersby, smiling strangers, the man and woman sitting next to us on the beach, the couples we might “hook up” with at a club, etc.—may not be who they claim to be.

BJ Sifrit was honor man in a class of seventeen Navy SEALs; a quiet, clean-cut, wholesome looking twenty-something from Texas. Erika was from a loving, caring, wealthy family; a business owner; an all-American high school basketball player.

It was easy to trust these people. Why wouldn’t you?

This story proves, however, that anyone can fall victim to the face of evil. The victims in this case—Martha “Geney” Crutchley and Joshua Ford—were smart, hardworking, middleclass people on holiday in Ocean City, Maryland, when they crossed paths with Erika and BJ. Meeting, they were four adults having a “good time” while on vacation. It all seemed so harmless.

What remains clear to me is that the horror Erika and BJ perpetrated against two wonderful, kind, and loving human beings in Ocean City on that Saturday night before Memorial Day in 2002 is, at its core, a depravity of such gargantuan proportions that the true nature behind these crimes can never be fully explained, understood, or accessed emotionally. It’s hard to really wrap our minds around what happened in that bathroom and the subsequent days when Erika and BJ were running around Ocean City seemingly celebrating their crimes. As summer bears down on us here in America, keep in mind that the world is not what it was twenty or even ten years ago—and the people you will meet this summer may not be who they claim to be.

To read an excerpt from CRUEL DEATH, click on either of the photos!


M. William Phelps is the author of several books,including: Perfect Poison, Lethal Guardian, Every Move You Make, Sleep In Heavenly Peace, Murder in the Heartland, Because You Loved Me, If Looks Could Kill, I’ll Be Watching You, Cruel Death (2009), Deadly Secrets (2009), Nathan Hale, and Failures of the Presidents

This post originally appeared on In Cold Blog June 25, 2009 

Sphere: Related Content
read more “Wrestling Evil”

Will Write For Food

February 24, 2009

By M. William Phelps

I have been thinking about starting this program for some time now, and when Gregg Olsen and I decided to pull the plug on CrimeRant in July 2008, it occurred to me that instead of putting that “free time” into another blog, I wanted to do something for those less fortunate than myself. But do it in the name of writing, and my love for books and authors.

The program I have created is WILL WRITE FOR FOOD. It involves authors of books helping out their local food banks. In today’s unstable economy, those families who have lost their livelihoods along with their jobs, added to a continually growing homeless population, need our help now more than ever.

The program is simple. If you write books—any genre of books—you qualify for membership. I am keeping it focused on book authors, obviously, because this is what I do for a living. What the program involves is a commitment—a simple, private commitment on the author’s part. For example, a certain percentage of my lecture/ speaking fees has gone and will continue to go to my local WILL WRITE FOR FOOD program as part of a small contribution I send as routinely as possible. I have adopted the Ellington Human Services food bank (in Ellington, CT) as my benefice.

I thought of starting a website or blog; but, to be honest, the time it will take to do that and keep it up and running is time I can spend devoted to the program itself. I don’t want to complicate this at all. The program is designed to support local food banks in the writer’s community. No more. No less. The idea is to help people get food on their tables. In a society that embraces $700 billion bailouts for the ultra rich, no one should have to go hungry.

No one!

I would like to hear from each author willing to make a commitment to my program. And from time to time, I will send out a newsletter email to everyone, updating each member with regards to how many are involved and how your generous contributions are helping. If you’re interested, please email me with the name and address of the charity/food bank in your community you will be donating to, along with a promise in writing to commit to the program and your thoughts about the program. Whenever you send me updates, please share a sentence or two about the experience of giving: how it made you feel/how it helped, etc. There’s no need to let me know how much money you’ve given—that’s between you and your food bank. The point is to give! Some authors may be doing this already (God bless you!); but I wanted to organize a program into a full-scale nationwide effort which will have an immediate impact. The idea is to keep it localized to each author’s community.

My email is: mwilliamphelps@comcast.net; if you wish to reach me by snail mail for any reason, send correspondence to: PO BOX 3215, Vernon, CT 06066. If you wish to call, please send an email request for my office telephone number.

People generally step up their “giving” efforts during the holiday season. And that is wonderful. But food banks, especially, hurt most during those months following the holidays, when people feel tapped out and depressed and more comfortable channel-surfing on the couch rather than scribing checks to charities. Summers are tough for charities, also. Making a commitment to give every month—even if it’s a turkey and some fixins, or a few boxes of macaroni and cheese—will help your local food bank during those times when they need it most.

Anybody can give, of course. But I want the authors involved in my program to mention the WILL WRITE FOR FOOD program in the offering. For example, author John Glatt recently participated. With his offering, John left a message: “From John Glatt, member of WILL WRITE FOR FOOD, Authors Joining Together to Help Fight Hunger in Their Communities.” I use John as an example simply because I roped him into my program this past holiday season.

“It was a humbling experience to donate a Christmas meal to a New York family in need,” John told me, “and I hope your worthy program attracts more writers … I have told several colleagues about it who are interested in participating.”

When you give as part of the program, please use the slogan: WILL WRITE FOR FOOD, Authors Joining Together to Help Fight Hunger in Their Communities. And please let me know which food bank/organization you gave to, so I can add your charity to a list I will post in my newsletters—and if I ever do start a website, I can at least list all the charities on the site with their addresses, so fans of each author, if they want to, can send checks to that author’s particular charity in the name of the author and his or her WILL WRITE FOR FOOD program.

When you think about it, as little as $50 can do wonders for a starving family. If 1,000 authors nationwide are giving $50 regularly to their local food banks, think about the impact on hunger we, as grateful book people, can make with this one grassroots campaign. Also, some food banks will accept bags of fresh vegetables from your garden during the summer months (I always have too many tomatoes and peppers and other vegetables falling from the vine and rotting, anyway), but please ask your food bank before heading over there with a trunk load of fresh veggies. It doesn’t have to be money or food; it could be as simple as going to your local dollar store and buying ten pairs of mittens or ten cans of corn and dropping them off. If you have no money, please give of your time.

I don’t need to get into how many people are starving in America. I feel truly blessed to be able to write books for a living. I am grateful that my readers are loyal and keep coming back book after book. WILL WRITE FOR FOOD is my small way of giving back. I know a lot of people give to their local churches, the Jaycees, the police union’s ball, Girl Scouts, and a host of other charities. I am asking that you add one more important charity to your list—a charity in your own town where you can actually see the impact your donation has on the faces of the people you help; but most important, a charity you’re giving to in the name of your craft of writing and your love for books.

To donate to Ellington Human Services food bank in the name of M. Williams Phelps and WILL WRITE FOR FOOD, send donations to:

Doris Crayton, Director
Ellington Human Services (Food Bank)
31 Arbor Way /P.O. Box 187
Ellington, CT 06029

Please give what you can. I spoke to Doris recently and she reported to me that there are “bare shelves” in the food pantry. Just a small donation can—literally—change someone’s life.

Sphere: Related Content
read more “Will Write For Food”

M. William Phelps has given ICB an “exclusive” excerpt from his new book, DEADLY SECRETS.

As the marketing for the book proclaims …

In the lovely town of Pleasant Valley in upstate New York, the maple trees were ablaze with fall's blood-red color. The air was crisp. And a woman named Susan Fassett left her weekly choir practice at a church - when a killer emerged from the shadows and mercilessly gunned her down...Stunned, the police immediately suspect Susan Fassett's husband and surround his home. They couldn't have been more wrong. Susan Fassett had been living a secret life, entangled in a passionate web of dominance, lesbian sex, betrayal - and a depraved plan for murder. After detectives untangled a web of secrets and corruption hidden in plain sight, the town of Pleasant Valley would be rocked again when a shocking trial exposed the whole sordid truth...

This gripping book has extortion, prostitution, government corruption, group sex and murder at its core. Amazingly, the killer, Dawn Silvernail, who refused to speak to reporters about the case, gave M. William Phelps exclusive interviews.


“That is how this case is being marketed,” Phelps said recently. “And, for the most part, it is all true, in some sort of quasi-Lifetime Television way. For me, however, this book is about hubris, abuse of power, small-town politics gone haywire (a brilliant word, incidentally, few of us use anymore), and influence going to one man’s head. But it is also about a son coming to terms with the death of his mother, who he valued as his best friend. This book proves that when a sociopath truly wants you dead, there’s very little you can do to stop it.”


Prologue


On that morning, after she dragged herself out of bed, put on her large-framed glasses, lit that first cigarette of the day and looked out the window, she began to think about her life. The wooded area surrounding her house reminded her how much she adored living in the Catskill Mountains. It was where she belonged. So secluded and pastoral. The air fresh, full of vitality. Almost too perfect a picture, really. This morning there was no wind. No snow. Temperatures in the high thirties, with just the right amount of punch in the air, reminding most that winter was soon coming. In fact, it occurred to her, as she sat, smoked and sipped her coffee, that Halloween was three days away. The kids would soon dress in plastic masks of former presidents, Power Rangers, Batman and Barbie, and walk up and down the neighborhood streets with pumpkin flashlights and toothless smiles.


The bliss. The splendor. The silence of the morning.


How had such a simple life, she thought, come down to this?


As she sat and considered things, the beauty of autumn and the innocence of living in the country meant little. She was in a terrible spot. Full of anxiety. Panic. Dismay. Even fear. Her gun was in the drawer underneath her waterbed, and whenever she walked by that area of the room, or sat down on the bed, it seemed to speak to her.


Finish the job.


Don’t do it.


But he’ll kill my son.


I must go through with it.


Indeed, there was one time not too long ago when she woke up in the middle of the night for no apparent reason and realized she was on the floor, staring at the open drawer, the gun sitting there atop her folded clothes looking back at her. And yet, she had no idea how she had gotten there.


“Psychologically,” she later explained, “it was working on me 24/7.”


It seemed so darn simple when she tossed it around in her mind. The threats to her family, she later claimed, in one respect, terrified her, and in another, made it easier to think about actually going through with his plan. She had known him for twenty-plus years. “He had a reputation,” she once said, “for being able to make bad things happen to people. Good people.”


He had connections in town—or, rather, that’s what he led people to think.


“I believed he was as powerful as John Gotti,” she later admitted.


“I know people,” he had once told her. “I’m connected,” was how he put it.


And that’s how this entire idea of murder began: a few idle threats and a seemingly routine telephone call with an invitation. “Come to my house,” he said. “We need to talk about things.”


He sounded serious and, all at the same time, urgent, which he could accomplish with that almost mature natural inflection of his. His tone, she said, could be menacing and put fear in you, but without alarm. He could intimidate and bully in subtle ways, without raising his voice.


The master manipulator.


The man with the gun in his hand.


The marionette who pulled the strings.


He was all of these.


And more.


Weeks before that October 28, 1999, morning, she drove the hour south from the Catskills, down into Pleasant Valley and on into Poughkeepsie, then Hyde Park, where he had lived all his life.


His wife wasn’t home when she arrived.


She never was.


“Come in,” he said, answering the door. “Come. I want to show you something.” He had a cocky smile on his face. He was up to something. She knew it.


Pulling into the driveway moments before, she had glanced over at the new garage out in back of his house. Nearly $500,000 dollars’ worth of metal, wood, concrete and aluminum. Where’d he get the money for that? Moreover, she knew the inside of that garage as if it were her own home. She had been in there with him—and her—and the others. She later said she hated herself for doing it. But then, he had that kind of control over people. He had always made her do things she didn’t want to.


And she did them.


For him. It was all for him.


Or so she said.


Walking into his house, she looked toward the dining room table, where he had a collection of photographs in a scattered pile, all spread out so she could see each one clearly. He encouraged her to take a closer look, saying, “Go ahead.” Then, pointing to one in particular, “You see that one?”


At first she was confused. Then horrified, she later said: “My mom, my son, my sisters, my stepchildren, my in-laws, my husband, everybody that was close to me. These were pictures that captured each one of these people in a setting where they were by themselves in a lonely place.”


Explaining further, she said there was a photograph of her aunt, for example, walking her dog. Just a casual stroll around the Catskill neighborhood where she lived with her husband. It was secluded and woodsy, where gun shots are a common occurrence. Someone had snapped an image of her aunt from afar, as if the photographer was conducting surveillance.


She picked it up off the table and pulled it closer. She couldn’t believe it.


“It would be a real shame,” he said as she lifted her glasses off the bridge of her nose to get a clearer view, staring intensely at the photo, “if there were a hit-and-run accident. That lady could be get badly hurt.”


She couldn’t believe what he was implying. He had said it with that low monotone: a clever little caveat implicit in the nuance of his voice she knew all too well. He didn’t need to make a direct threat. No doubt something he had perfected from his years of bossing people around as the water superintendent in nearby Poughkeepsie. He loved that: the control. To be able to tell people what to do. It made him feel like he was somebody. Being short in stature, many later said, he had that dreaded short person’s chip on his shoulder: a Napoleon complex. Today, though, standing in his kitchen, with those photos spread across the table as she stood next to him and trembled, he was larger than life. Ten feet tall.


She winced. Are you serious?


“In addition to members of your family staying healthy,” he snapped, “I’ll exonerate that debt you owe me.”


The photograph of her son hurt more than any of them. Her son was standing on the dock of the building where he worked, smoking a cigarette, staring off into the distance.


Man, how she loved that kid, her only child.


To put it into context, she later said, “This building is out in the middle of nowhere.”


He watched as she stared at that photo. He let her think about it some. Then he said, “It’d sure be a shame if there was a drive-by shooting and your son was hit. Out there, nobody would ever know. The noise of all those machines inside the building …”

He sort of laughed to himself.


Standing, thinking about the photographs and his threats, she went through their life together. She remembered that his first wife had been terrified of him. During the divorce proceedings, he had hired someone to run her off the road. Then, apparently, she later heard, he hired a dump truck driver to swerve into her lane and hit her. It never happened. But the implication was always there that no one refused him when he wanted something.


“If this man would do that to a woman he supposedly loved,” she told herself, “what’s he going to do to people he doesn’t even know?”


Some friend. She had believed, in so many different ways, that they were friends. She had known him for so long. Two decades and counting. She’d slept with him when no other woman would have him. Kept him company when his wives walked out. He’d even proposed marriage to her once; but she turned him down. “Friends with benefits,” was the deal between them. Nothing more. She could never love him that way. They had been through so much together. Births and deaths. Wives and husbands. Sure, she owed him a bundle, borrowing $300 here, $400 there, running a tab of close to—and again, this is her count—five thousand dollars. But when she borrowed the money, he had always told her, “Don’t worry about it. No need to pay me back.”


Now she knew why. Now he wanted that money back—but in a different way. It was as if their lives together, and so-called “friendship,” had led up to this one furtive, seminal moment that would help shape their future. He had been grooming her. She could wipe out her debt to him in one fatal moment, he suggested, and, at the same time, save her family from being hurt.


It was her choice. Take it … or, of course, leave it.


But then, if she walked away, she’d have to live with the consequences, he insisted, which were sitting on the table in front of her.


She felt involved to a point where there was only one way out—or at least that’s how she saw it. She had to do what he wanted. There was no other way. He would hurt her family. He would expose all of those nasty, salacious sexual acts she had been doing for him with those other men and that other woman, whom he now wanted dead—sexual acts he had on videotape. It would destroy her reputation. Ruin her marriage. She’d lose the respect of her son. Not to mention her job.


Was there any other choice?


Deadly Secrets Excerpt © Copyright M. William Phelps 2009. All Rights Reserved.

M. William Phelps is the author of 12 books: Perfect Poison, Lethal Guardian, Every Move You Make, Sleep In Heavenly Peace, Murder in the Heartland, Because You Loved Me, If Looks Could Kill, I’ll Be Watching You, Cruel Death (2009), Deadly Secrets (2009), Nathan Hale, and Failures of the Presidents


Sphere: Related Content
read more “An Exclusive Preview of DEADLY SECRETS by M. William Phelps”

By Michelle McKee with M. William Phelps


According to the Uniform Crime Reports published by the FBI, the arrests of juveniles for murder has increased 26.1 percent since 2005, and the 2008 data isn’t even out yet. Are we going to see yet another increase in the number of “teen killers” arrested in the United States? If any clue can be taken from what has been reported in the news over the last year, it looks likely that the trend will continue.

And some of these murders are taking on increasingly bizarre twists, in some cases ritualistic aspects, which on the surface appear to be related to the sub-culture these teens belong. Take the murderers of Matthew Silliman and Billy Lee Black, for example.

Matthew Silliman was lured to an abandoned trailer by four of his friends and then suffocated. Drew Logan Shaw, Allegra Rose Dahlquist, Aadil Shaaid Kahn, and Ryan Patrick Hare are alleged to have hatched an intricate plan to murder the 18-year old Silliman. Included in the evidence collected from the crime scene was Potassium Bromide and Diazapam, syringes, along with burned incense and ashes. After reading Silliman his fortune with tarot cards, his mouth was duct taped, he was bound, and then beat in the head with a hammer. The manner of his death has been said to be eerily reminiscent of lyrics found in songs by the Insane Clown Posse.

Billy Lee Black was found Halloween morning in an alley near his home, he had been stabbed multiple times. Charged with solicitation of first-degree murder is his 16-year daughter, Danielle Black. She had asked a schoolmate to kill her father, but a third person, Alec Eger, stands accused of committing the crime. Danielle alleged that her father had been abusing her, but police have not substantiated the accusation. Black is alleged to have been part of a group of teens that would cut themselves and suck each other’s blood

I recently had an opportunity to speak with award-winning investigative journalist and author M. William Phelps about his views on the motivating factors influencing today’s teens towards what is an obvious escalation in the commission of murder by juveniles.

What is it that interests you about these "teen killer" cases?

MWP: What interests me about the Matthew Sillman and Danielle Black cases in particular is the culture, mainly. In the Silliman matter, what led four friends to kill their peer? Matthew Sillman seemed like a normal teenager who, like most, was heading into his rebellious years. I've been speaking with some of the teens involved in that group of kids Sillman hung with. Why has the society these kids were raised in let them down--and why have they turned to violence? These are important questions. Teenage angst has gone today from fists fights to means of violence few of us can comprehend. How has murder become an answer to solving teen social issues? Most would be shocked to hear what kids today are truly involved in. Every time we mention video games or drugs or violence on television as a motivation for this madness, part of the liberal and conservative public winces, and doesn't seem to want to face up to the fact that we've created the stage for these kids and given them the skills to act out. Why is evil answered with more intense evil? These are questions I'd like to explore in a book about the Sillman case.

What do you believe is the driving force enabling teens today to actively engage in the premeditated planning and carrying out of wanton, willful murder?

MWP: This dark culture that Sillman, his so-called friends, and other teens across the nation are involved in, is part of the driving force behind a new wave of violence we’re seeing. Kids used to fist fight in the park when a disagreement arose; now they want a deeper, more meaningful and personal means to revenge. I think MySpace and Facebook have, in some way, contributed to this. Think about it. On the Internet a kid can project any image of him/herself he or she wants to. You look at some of these social networking pages and you see a deep-seated need for what? Acceptance. A generation ago, you could hardly find a kid with a tattoo; today, it's hard to find a kid without a tattoo. A lot of these kids are into Wicca and vampires and drinking blood and all sorts of other behaviors that seem to be saying, 'I need more stimulation. I need more attention. I need more love.' I mean ask yourself, 'What could a kid be getting from all of this?'

Kids are not content with what they were 25 years ago. A lot of this has to do with the Internet and a society of selfish adults focused on me, me, me. We’re losing touch with our children while focusing too much on ourselves and our Blackberries and iPhones. This comes at a cost. Did we not learn anything from Columbine? Did we not learn that there is nothing more important than giving kids our time?

Was there already a history of violence amongst Silliman and his peers, which may have led to his murder?

MWP: A friend of one of the four charged with Sillman’s death said that the group was 'often misunderstood.' Billy Schenck was in court to support his friend, Drew Shaw, who has been charged with murder. Schenck said afterward, 'We're not a gang. We're not violent.'

I’m sure that’s all true. Sillman was a Boy Scout at one point, a regular attendee at church on Sundays, so I have heard. Granted, they were not a gang or violent in a sense that they went around causing trouble--but there is much more here than what we see. Reality blurring with fantasy might have been part of this. Music will become a part of this story. Which again, leads me back to the culture argument. From a source I have been interviewing, someone inside this group Sillman was from, I can say that there was a lot of boredom involved here: kids wandering through life looking for things to do, things to stimulate them. What happens then? What happens when kids have too much time on their hands without having to answer for it? Add a bit of cultural influence in the form pure vile music disguised as artistic expression and you have a time bomb. Look, there are some artists who take their craft seriously and understand it for what it is—think Marylyn Manson, Slipknot, etc. These bands understand the theatre aspect and what KISS and Alice Cooper created. But with other bands, we're talking about something entirely different.

While arguments have been raised by others regarding the influence of violent video games on teen violence, what is on the nightly news is not fantasy and the material is frequently worse and far more violent than that of a video game which depicts a make believe reality. Do you believe that the news media itself has played any part in blurring the line between reality and fantasy?

MWP: The attention spans of our children--heck, us adults too--have been hijacked by technology and an overload of information. Take a look at the news shows on TV. You have a small portion of the screen for the talking head in one corner, a sidebar of three stories coming up next, a ticker of so-called 'news' scrolling down along the bottom, maybe a poll, and some 'facts' about the story the talking head is blabbering about flashing somewhere else on the screen--and there's even an ad popping up here and there promoting another show. The television screen has been turned into a web site! And most of what is pimped as news today is opinion. Pure conjecture. What does all of this do to an un-/under-developed mind? I will not agree that the news is more violent than the video games we're seeing released these days. Kids in general don’t watch the news much, anyway, so they are getting most of their information from the Internet. The Internet is raising our children. And on the Internet a kid can get anything he or she wants.

Why the Matthew Silliman case?

MWP: As you know, I am exploring the Danielle Black case in Hagerstown, Maryland. This case of Matthew Sillman is much more than what it seems on the surface: there's an element here that will shock the public once they learn about it. Tarot cards and hammers as murder weapons? Depression and a culture of more, more, more plays a part in all of this, as I have been saying. According to sources, Sillman was 'spiraling' downward near the time he disappeared. Here was a kid who, at some point, was dedicated to teaching (younger scouts) and active in his church, and then he suddenly changed. It happens. Sure. But something inspired the change.


M. William Phelps is the author of 12 books: Perfect Poison, Lethal Guardian, Every Move You Make, Sleep In Heavenly Peace, Murder in the Heartland, Because You Loved Me, If Looks Could Kill, I’ll Be Watching You, Cruel Death (2009), Deadly Secrets (2009), Nathan Hale, and Failures of the Presidents


Photo by Claudia Olsen

Sphere: Related Content
read more “Teen Killers: An Escalation of Violence”

By Michelle McKee


When authors Gregg Olsen and M. William Phelps announced this past July that the blogosphere's most beloved true crime web site, Crime Rant, was closing shop, a collective wail rose up across the Interwebz. Their readers have been convulsing in withdrawal ever since.

I recently spoke with one half of the elusive pair, and M. William Phelps shared a little bit of what he’s been working on. Readers are going to have some great stories coming their way from this author!

In addition to two new true-crime books set to be released in 2009, Phelps is working on a biography of Amy Archer-Gilligan, serial killer and healthcare pioneer, as well as writing his very first thriller; a crime novel, of course. He is also currently conducting interviews for two future true-crime books and has just recieved his first true-crime literary award.

The first case he's working on is the Jessica and Jeff McCord case out of Birmingham/Hoover, Alabama. Jessica McCord was convicted of murdering her ex-husband, Alan, and his wife, Terra Bates; her husband Jeff, a Pelham, Alabama police officer, plead guilty.

The second case Phelps is focusing on is that of Danielle Black, who has been charged as a juvenile in the death of her father, 47-year-old Billy Lee Black, who was found on Oct. 31, 2008, stabbed, lying in a pool of his own blood. Nineteen-year-old Alec Scott Eger of Hagerstown, Maryland, has been charged with first-degree murder and felony murder in Billy Lee Black's death. Danielle allegedly solicited another boy to commit the murder.

"These two cases are top priority for me." Phelps says. "I have sources talking and both are incredible true-crime stories. Some of you may have heard me talking about the Eric/Erin McClean case lately, but I have put it on the back burner for now for several reasons I would rather not get into it at this time. I am not abandoning that project by any means. I just need to focus on Black and McCord for now. I have been juggling several true-crime cases for the past six months and just recently signed a deal for several books, so my priority is to my editor and publisher.”

Late yesterday it was announced that I’ll Be Watching You is the winner of 2008 New England Book Festival Award, "Genre-Based" division. The Award Ceremony is January 24, 2009, in Providence, Rhode Island.

"I am humbled by this, my first true-crime award," says Phelps. "I am completely honored and grateful for the opportunity to be able to do what I love for a living. I'm lucky, I know. Never in my wildest dreams would I have considered the idea that my work would be celebrated in this way by such a well-regarded committee of readers. I have a tremendous amount of respect and sincerity for the victims I wrote about in the book, one of whom trusted me enough to tell me her incredible story of survival and redemption."

If you have any information regarding either the McCord or the Black case Please contact M. William Phelps at mwilliamphelps@comcast.net. You can also visit him on the web at http://www.mwilliamphelps.com/

M. William Phelps is the author of 12 books: Perfect Poison, Lethal Guardian, Every Move You Make, Sleep In Heavenly Peace, Murder in the Heartland, Because You Loved Me, If Looks Could Kill, I’ll Be Watching You, Cruel Death (2009), Deadly Secrets (2009), Nathan Hale, and Failures of the Presidents

Photo by Claudia Olsen

Sphere: Related Content
read more “M. William Phelps: Still Telling Tales”

By M. William Phelps

Cynthia George was released from prison last year after an appeals court in Ohio overturned her guilty verdict in the murder of her former lover, Jeff Zack, who was shot in the face in June 2001 while sitting in his SUV at an Akron, Ohio BJ's Wholesale Warehouse Club fuel station. John Zaffino, Cynthia's other lover, was convicted of the murder and is serving a life sentence. People closely connected to the case are sick over Cynthia's release. Many in Ohio view it as "money can buy you freedom ..." Cynthia is married to a very wealthy restaurateur, Ed George. They live in a mansion outside Akron. They have seven children--one of whom is Jeff Zack's, the dead lover.

For whatever reason, John Zaffino has never come forward and said that Cynthia was involved with him in this crime. But then, Zaffino has never admitted that he actually murdered Jeff Zack, so we have a situation where a murderer would have to admit his role first in order to point a finger at his former lover. I expect that to happen after all of Zaffino’s appeals have been exhausted.

For me, writing the book, IF LOOKS COULD KILL, about this case proved that in the context of a prosecution’s case based almost entirely on circumstantial evidence, there is no better proof of a conspiracy to commit murder than the circumstances surrounding that crime. In other words, people can lie. Witnesses can walk into court and lie about what they've seen or heard. Circumstances, on the other hand, almost never lie. They are what they are. Think about it for a moment. Two people walk into a room. One walks out with blood on his hands. The other is dead. Is there any question regarding who caused the death? No. The question, instead, becomes, Was it murder? The circumstances certainly point to murder, but it is the prosecution’s job to then put together a case to prove as much.

In this case, it's harder for me to believe that Cynthia George did not have anything to do with this crime than it is to believe she did. I hope that is clear. There's no smoking gun with her prints on it; but there is a truckload of evidence pointing to her knowledge of and participation in this crime before it took place.

In this book, I think I present a fairly solid case to back up that opinion. But Cynthia is a free woman. She was found to be, essentially in the end, not guilty. And the sad part of it all is, Cynthia George, like OJ Simpson, can now admit to a murder and never be tried for it again.

Author photo by Claudia Olsen

Sphere: Related Content
read more “Travesty of Justice, or Justice Finally Served?”


There's an unwritten in the media most of us stand behind. Except for extremely high-profile cases—i.e., Maddie McCann—we here in the states don’t pay much attention to crime stories happening in the UK, same as they don’t pay much attention to our crime stories.

A handshake deal. You know.

One thing I’ve noticed in recent years, however, is that true crime in general has a much larger audience in the UK than it does here. Not just the books. But crime news of any kind. For this reason, I scan the UK wires every week to see what’s being said, etc. This is why I about spit out my coffee when I read the following headline a while back: “The pornography of misery memoirs.”


The Daily Mail article was written by Danuta Kean. According to her Website, Kean is “an award winning freelance arts journalist and publishing commentator, whose work appears in national newspapers including the Times and Financial Times. She presents Textual Analysis on http://www.channel4radio.com/, which features in-depth interviews with authors. She also writes a column for the Author and is a regular contributor to a number of other literary magazines. She has also edited two reports into cultural diversity. As well as books she writes about music, film and the creative industries.”


Not a bad CV.

The subhead to the article was even more ridiculous than the headline: “Drunken mothers, bestial fathers, pedophilia and incest. They’re the titillating popcorn of publishing today. Here, in a furious blast against her own trade, a leading book industry figure attacks the lucrative market in ‘misery memoirs’…”


The story, for the most part, was about Dana Fowley, who “came to public attention after declaring that she still loves her mother, Catherine Dunsmore, even though Dunsmore ‘supplied’ Dana, now 27, and her sister to a 15-strong pedophile ring, which systematically raped and molested her from the age of six to 15.”


Reading on, I was astounded to learn that pedophile and molestation stories are quickly becoming the UK’s largest selling true crime books.

“Dana’s been talked into selling her story to a publisher for a staggering £200,000,” Danuta says.

Now, if Danuta had stopped there, I would have, like most, scratched my head and wondered, Gees, there seems to be something wrong with this. But she had to make it personal and, with a sweeping attack on all of us who write true crime, blast a genre she obviously knows very little about.


"[Am I] the only one to think that the gaggle of publishers who bid so high so quickly have more than a whiff of ambulance-chasers about them?”

That is an old insult: calling us ambulance chasers. Sure, there are some (in our genre here in the states, too), but a majority of the TC authors working today respect their work and practice journalism. Those who write TC memoirs, moreover, have their own reasons for doing it—reasons we shouldn’t question.

Danuta went on … and on … But, judging by the current trend for ever more graphic tales of sexual abuse, just months after seeing her mother incarcerated Dana will be expected to perform an emotional striptease and deliver up every graphic detail of her abuse for public consumption.


Every molestation, every forced depravity and every betrayal by her mother is likely to be demanded in full color for readers who will revel in the pornography of misery.
If Dana’s book follows the disturbing wave of recent misery memoirs, it will read as if you were there: as if you were the victim - or the perpetrator.


Even among the ghoulish world of misery memoir publishing there is a sense of shock at the haste with which Dana has been pounced on.


“I think it is going to be the most horrible yet,” says one ghostwriter, with a hint of relish at the detail it may reveal.


“I have heard it described as ‘the book to end all books’ on the subject.”
Well, I wish it were. Because the slew of such memoirs pumped out at the behest of supermarkets - which sell these books in the kind of quantities normally reserved for The Da Vinci Code - have crossed a line this year.


Rather than inspire, they risk titillating with the intimate detail they provide: members of religious cults rape young girls, fathers rape sons.


The descriptions are vivid and explicit as publishers fall over themselves to provide increasingly shocking accounts to take a chunk out of a market that is now worth £24 million.


From here, she goes on to describe—in lurid detail, mind you—the subject matter of several books. My favorite line: “In Please, Daddy, No: A Boy Betrayed,” Danuta writes, “Stuart Howarth provides relentless detail about repeated rapes by his father. He was even forced by the brute to have sex with pigs. ... No wonder that some claim these uninhibited accounts offer pedophiles tips on how to groom children and ensure their foul activities remain closeted.
Not that the publishers and ghostwriters responsible see it that way.
A lot of those readers are women with children,” insists Carol Tonkinson, non-fiction publisher at Harper-Collins, the market leader in misery lit - though the publisher prefers the name “inspirational literature” (like fairy tales, a happy ending is compulsory). “Eighty-five percent of these books sell in supermarkets,” she replies, when I tell her about the unsavory men I have seen hanging round the “abuse/incest” section in the Borders bookshop chain.


Danuta then claims that the books sell so well because, “I suppose that in the same way a horror film gives us a vicarious thrill by allowing us to be terrified without any risk to ourselves, so reading stories of abuse from the comfort of our sofas means we can experience the chill of fear and disgust as voyeurs, without ever having to confront such nightmares in our own lives.”

This has all been said before. I'm tired of it. When you beat this dead horse, you come across as a bitter (frustrated) and confused writer who doesn’t understand the genre, lashing out at a group of readers who don’t really have to explain why they buy the books they like, no more, perhaps, than the bowtie-wearing academic who buys the Mechanics of Genetics and other Juicy Intellectual Stories from the college bookstore does.

Furthermore, calling Danuta Kean a “leading publishing figure” is a bit of a stretch. She bills herself as an author of “literary” articles, a publishing industry gatekeeper of sorts, which should automatically exclude her from commenting on anything true crime. It’s sad, too, because I have yet to see a leading TC author go after the literary elite, simply because we have no business stepping on the toes of someone in a different genre--or any one of our colleagues, for that matter. Nor should we be questioning why an abused woman sells her story.

With a few exceptions, TC outsells literary fiction and nonfiction, incidentally, at least five to one. That alone should beckon one to think that maybe there’s a tight stitch in Danuta Kean’s knickers somewhere.


The “King of Misery,” Danuta writes, “is Andrew Crofts, one of the ghostwriters of Jane Elliott’s The Little Prisoner (the story of a woman who was kept prisoner by her violent and sexually abusive stepfather); Stuart Howarth’s horrifying tome; and a book by Tom Wilson called Tears Before Bedtime, about the abuse he suffered in a children’s home, which is out this month.”

The one thing we can say here is that our titles—save for a few really cheap and dirty ones—are at least a bit more respectful than Tears Before Bedtime, which is just awful.


UK publishers and editors, Danuta says, justify the “harrowing detail” in their books by saying their readership—get this!—is not quite as smart as it is in other genres, so things have to be spelled out more graphically and more clearly to feed that under-educated demo.


Danuta wrotes: Oh, please! How stupid does a person have to be if they don’t understand the terrible impact of sexual abuse without having to read the horrific detail? The chief reason to include detail that borders on pornographic is to entertain a prurient readership which would otherwise be reading about Fred and Rose West in the kind of True Crime books up-market publishers like to sneer at. Publishers churn out these misery tales for one reason: they sell.
The phenomenon began when Dave Pelzer’s A Child Called It raced up the charts in 2000. Publishers sat up. When his follow-up books were equally successful - how many misery memoirs can one man write - selling 3.5 million copies in the UK alone, publishers did what they always do when they sniff a lucrative new market: they jumped right in. And they have been rewarded. Toni McGuire’s Don’t Tell Mummy: A True Story Of Ultimate Betrayal, about a six-year-old abused by her father with her mother’s complicity, has sold a whopping 235,669 copies in paperback since publication in March. The paperback of Stuart Howarth’s book has sold 107,168 since May, having sold a similar number in hardback.

Those numbers speak themselves.


Publishing seems to be viewed the same way, no matter which side of the pond you’re on. According to Danuta, “The editorial director of one house admits: ‘When these books come in for consideration, whatever anyone says, you are looking at how shocking the story is, and the marketing team is asking: ‘Is she promotable? Can she squeeze out tears on [TV]?’”

This is true here, too.


But pornographic … I’m a bit uncomfortable with that word being associated with true crime or memoir. I can name a dozen or more literary novels that definitely are pornographic to the core—in fact, cheaply disguised “literature” that is nothing more than an author’s sick and twisted mind laid out on the page in the name of art.

Give me a freakin’ break, Danuta. Apples and oranges! Get your damn facts straight before you take a braod poke at a genre.


“But just because readers want it does not mean the trade should supply it,” Danuta argues. “A line needs to be drawn. Claiming that explicit stories of sexual abuse benefit abused people everywhere is wishful thinking.”

After another long diatribe, she finally concludes, “For publishers to claim a moral high ground about books whose contents would be better off kept between client and therapist is disingenuous. It is all about profits—especially when they come from supermarket-sized sales.”


I detect a bit of disappointment—even jealousy—that maybe inside Danuta is an author that has yet to publish a book just yet.

True crime numbers here in the states have always played on a sort of wavy bar graph that resembles a series of hills. Highs and middles, but never any lows. The 80s was a great decade for true crime—sales skyrocketed (those here on IN COLD BLOG who published then can back me up here). The 1990s saw a major decline from the 80s, as cable TV and “crime news” became more popular. Today the industry is—albeit slowly—creeping up once again, but is nowhere near the numbers from the past.


The bottom line is, there’s a market for this stuff—and it’s no different than any other genre in publishing. If we say one genre exploits its subject matter and the other doesn’t, we are lying to ourselves. Cheating ourselves out of what it means to publish books to begin with. We can’t mandate what the public consumes and what it should not consume. That’s a form of censorship. We can only put it out there and let the market decide what it wants.

I’m not sure I understand the growing trend in the UK for abuse stories—truly graphic sexually explicit stories that personally make my stomach turn. And then the story a few weeks ago of the little girl in the leopard shirt on the video came out and it was "breaking news."


To be honest, I had to turn off my television. I couldn’t look at the stills from that video. I didn’t want those images in my head. Just the thought of what that Lucifer did to that child made me ill. But there it was … all over the television, in the news, on the Web. A major story. A graphic case of sexual exploitation and abuse turned into a commodity.

There’s something inside some of us that says, I don’t want to look, but I will. That rubberneck mentality. We can debate until the next century why we like true crime stories and why these books are so popular. We’ll come up with the same lame answers time and again: we want to know what makes these people tick; we want to explore the darker side of the human condition and learn from it.


That’s BS—and we know it.

Let’s face it. Part of it is the same reason why Chris Hanson’s “To Catch a Predator” series was so successful before it was taken off the air because of several major law suits—there’s a part of the soul that says, Life isn’t that bad for me, no matter how tough I have it; at least I’m not like that person. Reading about the tragedy of others makes us feel good about our own lives.


It’s human nature.

For Miss Danuta Kean to judge it, however, is totally hypocritical on her part—especially since she uses the Web as a tool to promote herself and her work. Don’t blame publishers and editors for running a business, or the authors for writing these stories.


This post first appeared on www.crimerant.com, a crime blog M. William Phelps runs with New York Times bestselling author Gregg Olsen.

Sphere: Related Content
read more “True Crime in the UK: A Genre Quickly Surpassing All Others”

By M. William Phelps


LISA MONTGOMERY'S TRIAL
is slated to begin in October. She is set to stand trial for kidnapping a baby she cut from the 8-month-old womb of Bobbie Jo Stinnett after strangling the woman unconscious.

Bobbie Jo bled to death after fighting with Lisa for her life and the life of her unborn child.

Lisa’s latest attempt to save her own life—she is facing the death penalty—is a claim that she is mentally ill and that her illness contributed to the crimes she committed.

Seems simple enough.

Well, think again.

According to Lisa’s neuropsychologist, she suffers from an illness that fools her into thinking she is pregnant.

This guy is a hired gun.

In court a few weeks ago he testified that the brain scans he took of Lisa’s big head indicate a consistency with women who suffer from a condition called pseudocyesis, which is a very rare psychological ailment that occurs in such a small number of people—four men included in one study I cited in my book—that it is hard for doctors to find cases to study.

In my book about Lisa and Bobbie Jo, I talked about this condition. Here’s an excerpt:

[The term pseudocyesis was coined by] John Mason Good in 1923 from the Greek words pseudes (false) and kyesis (pregnancy). Others claim the condition has been around for thousands of years, as it was first mentioned in 300 B.C. by Hippocrates, who wrote about twelve women who “believed they were pregnant.” Every definition of pseudocyesis is, for the most part, the same: a hallucination “pregnancy in women usually resulting from a strong desire or need for motherhood,” which clearly defined Lisa Montgomery’s behavior. Many women even stop menstruating as their “abdomen becomes enlarged and the breasts swell and even secrete milk, mimicking genuine pregnancy.”

Lisa Montgomery, several members of her immediate family agreed, had been irregular with her menstrual cycle most of her life. There was plenty of evidence to prove her stomach was distended whenever she claimed to be pregnant—whether she swallowed air and made it happen herself or not—and she openly displayed other characteristics that would have led people to have no reason to question her. In some women, the syndrome is so pronounced, the desire to have a child so deeply engrained in their psyche, the uterus and cervix “show signs of pregnancy” and “urine tests may be falsely positive.”

There was no evidence available to show any one of Lisa’s many false pregnancies had gone that far. …

Lisa Montgomery does not suffer from pseudocyesis.

This is a fact.

The prosecution put an expert on the stand to counter this baseless claim, professor of neurology at the Montreal Neurological Institute, Alan Evans, who told the court “there was no evidence of such a condition” in Lisa’s case. From a careful review of the data, Evans confirmed that Lisa’s “brain is very close to normal.”

In other words, she had better come up with a better plan.

One of the problems with our system is that when we have defendants who are beyond a doubt 100% guilty, like Lisa Montgomery, the system allows them to sit down and take a look at all of the legal opportunities available and pick and choose a defense that fits their case. Justice has no part in this.

What I mean is, Lisa Montgomery admitted to her crimes. She was caught with Bobbie Jo’s baby in her arms and a mixture of her and Bobbie’s DNA was found in Bobbie’s house, in the trunk of Lisa’s car, under Lisa’s fingernails, and so on and so forth.

She spent months planning her crime—against Bobbie Jo. She picked Bobbie Jo and she learned how to do a C-section on the Internet weeks before the crime.

The need to have a child for Lisa overtook her senses, that much I will agree with. Lisa was not obsessed with being pregnant, however: she was obsessed with having a baby to cover up a progression of lies in her life.

Big difference between that and a woman suffering from pseudocyesis.

The way our system works, however, allows this waste of tax dollars to take place in Kansas City. Defendants can sit down and pick and choose a defense—instead of simply taking responsibility for their crimes and facing the jury.

Phelps runs a blog with Gregg Olsen, www.crimerant.com, where a version of this post first published. His first crime book in 18 months, BECAUSE YOU LOVED ME, will be published in December.

Sphere: Related Content
read more “Picking and Choosing a Defense: Lisa Montgomery's Latest Claim”

To Kill A Predator

August 23, 2007

By M. William Phelps

I ONCE CAME
up with a television show concept that, well, wasn’t going to fly based solely on the violence factor that would have to be part of it.

The title will explain: To Kill a Predator.

Yes, I stole the title and the idea.

But mine has a twist to it.

The pitch: a group of computer geeks posing as young kids entrap predators on the Internet and invite them to a “secret” location.

Instead of Chris Hanson and his camera crew waiting, however, out of the bushes or from around the back of the house comes a bat-wielding, masked man, who chases the predator down and, well, I’m sure you can picture the rest.

These predators don’t get taken away in plastic handcuffs; they get a good old-fashioned ass-whoopin—and it’s all caught on tape.

Maybe it’s a little much. Maybe we’re not ready for something like this yet.

Give it some time … reality TV will catch up. There are lots of Sopranos actors out of work.

Seriously now, there is something about that Predator show—save for Hanson’s cockiness—that is addicting. You cannot watch just one episode, even if you’ve seen it five times already.

What it is about the show that makes us feel good?

Is it that we know while watching that these skeazy, slimeball predators are going to get caught and be embarrassed and prosecuted? Or that we might just happen to see someone we know on the show someday?

I personally love watching them squirm and slither and try to talk their way out of it.

The other day, I was watching MSNBC and on came this woman from a great little Web site that I want to promote: StopBaptistPredators.org

The Web site proclaims the following revelation:

This “little light” shines for the many other clergy abuse victims whose voices have been silenced. Silenced by shame. Silenced by the false instruction of religious leaders. Silenced by church shunning and bullying. Silenced by church contracts for secrecy. Silenced by suicide. The mission of StopBaptistPredators is to break the silence of Baptist clergy sex abuse.

Anything we can do here at Crime Rant [and In Cold Blog] to promote the exposing of abusers and predators, we’re all for it. One of the most shocking stories of late—a story front and center on the StopBaptistPredators site—is from a Southwest suburban Southern Baptist congregation that recently allowed a convicted child sex offender to preach for the last few years.


Yes, allowed him. Knowing full well what he had done.

From the Chicago Sun Times:

[D]espite his past, and a warning from his previous church that he might still be dangerous, the Chicago Sun-Times has learned. In 1996, Jeff Hannah [pictured above] was sentenced to nine years in prison for having sexual relations with four underage girls — ages 15 to 17 — while a married youth minister at Crossroads Church in Libertyville. Hannah was paroled in 2001 and joined the First Baptist Church of Romeoville, where his new wife was a member. Soon after, the pastor moved on, and church members — aware of Hannah’s crimes — asked him to step into the pulpit until a replacement was hired, according to church members, Hannah and others. Hannah served in that role for three years and ever since has been a fill-in preacher, teacher and music minister at the church.

This scumbag had even brought in an ex-con friend of his and allowed him to preach at the same church.

Chicago Sun Times:

Authorities say there’s no evidence that Hannah has re-offended—and Hannah insists he has not—but he abruptly resigned his membership in the congregation when a [Times] reporter started inquiring about him last week.

In our church, we believe in forgiveness,” said Del Kirkpatrick, one of the deacons who hired Hannah.

Thanks be to God—er, I mean StopBaptistPredators.org—for exposing this scum. Regardless whether he has re-offended or not, he’s a freakin’ sexual predator. Get that through your thick head, Deacon.

Chew on it.

Pray on it.

But for God’s sakes, wake the hell up.

Phelps runs the blog Crime Rant with author Gregg Olsen, where this post originally ran.

Sphere: Related Content
read more “To Kill A Predator”

***Post by M. William Phelps***

HOW DO WE allow entertainers—I refuse to call him a journalist—such as Bill O’Reilly to get away with making erroneous accusations against people by writing off their defamatory remarks as hard news?

How do we allow such tabloidish hearsay to be broadcast under the umbrella of actual reporting—actual truth?

We report, you decide … Fair and balanced.

Yup. Okay, Rupert. We got it.

Most, if not all, of us on this blog work hard—very freakin’ hard—to get it right on the page (or in the courtroom). We spend months. We track leads. We match up testimony against documents and the exhaustive interviews we conduct, and we do our best to figure things out from there.

Our words are vetted. We’re questioned. “Where’d that come from? Who said that? Take that out. What is your source for this?”

Then--and only then--do we report.

Afterward, we get those stupid-ass reviews Gregg talked about the other day, along with disparaging, hurtful letters from people who don’t know a damn thing about us or what it takes to write a nonfiction book.

And we let it bounce off our thick, rubbery skin.

And we don’t respond.

And, as much as we want to, we don’t fight back.

Then we somehow manage to put our noses back to the grindstone and do it all over again.

Last week on his show, Bill-o said: “The [O’Reilly] Factor has learned—from sources we have to protect—that Natalee Holloway, the 18-year-old Alabama woman who disappeared two years ago in Aruba, died from cardiac arrest brought on by an overdose of cocaine."

Sources we have to protect.

Right.

Protect from what? From whom?

We don’t know, of course, because Bill-o won't tell us.

In another breath, Bill-o called them “inside sources” from the island.

Then he referred to them as “top law enforcement officials.” (Focus on the plural … )

A moment later it was down to an “official.”

He named Joran van der Sloot, Deepak Kalpoe and his brother, Satish, as the three people with Natalee when she took her final, fatal “overdose” of cocaine.

More breaking news from The Factor.

Then his guest, Geraldo, went into this monologue about drugs on the island and how readily available they are in this tourist destination that has suffered major setbacks since Natalee went missing.

Missing is correct. No body yet. No one knows what happened.

Unless we’re all being conned.

Geraldo said prostitutes and drugs are widespread on Aruba. It’s where every high school kid wants to go to party after graduation. In fact, when the Geraldo show went down to Aruba with Natalee’s uncles shortly after Natalee disappeared, they were offered all sorts of drugs.

“And again,” Bill-o butted in, “The Factor has not been able to confirm what I told you, however, it does come from an enormously credible source. I can tell you that.”

New slogan. We report … you decide if our unconfirmed reports are credible.

It’s long, sure--but it does have ring to it.

The 65- to 75-year-old Conservative Republican seniors that make up a majority of Bill-o’s demographic might buy this type of quasi-reporting, but the mainstream base should condemn this guy and his show for busting out with this so-called “news” and not backing it up.

Any of it!

Are we to trust FOX and Bill-o on their reputations alone? These are the same people who bash a guy like Seymour Hersh.

Seymour Hersh!

Look, when we watch ET or Inside Edition, we know we’re ingesting potato chips and Twinkies--things that are bad for us.

The Factor comes at us as if it is some sort of hard news show.

It’s not.

In the report, Bill-o says, “This is information that the Factor has not been able to confirm independently because there’s no body! But law enforcement officials believe that … exactly what I said.”

According to Bill-o and his law enforcement official(s), “Natalee ingested the cocaine with Joran van der Sloot and one of the Kalpoe brothers and her body was then disposed of in the ocean …”

None of Bill-o’s sources were on the show. Instead, we get Geraldo: “I think it’s totally plausible.”

As is aliens coming down and taking Natalee away in circular-shaped metal disc.

If Joran and/or the Kalpoes had told this to police during one of their interrogations, wouldn’t they have been arrested and charged? Wouldn’t this have come out sooner?

Hard news is gone from television airwaves today. The type of unbridled, un-opinionated, unbiased, direct reporting that made television news of the 50s, 60s and even 70s something we could depend on.

A man with a cigarette between his fingers. Good night, and good luck.

An unmistakable, gravelly voice of objectivity. And that’s the way it is …

Instead: an unabashed bully with a pulpit and a bullhorn. You’re about to enter a spin zone.

Err, that's no-spin zone. Sorry, Bill.

One question: Would Walter or Dan or Murrow ever pimp pens, coffee cups, t-shirts and whatever other Factor gear Bill-o sells during his so-called news report?

Picture that for a moment.

Don't those products tell us something about the news the Factor sells?

***M.William Phelps blogs with Gregg Olsen at www.crimerant.com***

Sphere: Related Content
read more “FOX NEWS: We Report, You Believe”

In Cold Blog is a true crime blog founded by best selling author Corey Mitchell, and is written by award winning journalists, authors, criminal justice professionals and others.

Click to...

Join Our Fan Page on Facebook!

Site Archive

Share Us With Friends!

Subscribe


Subscribe to Our Feed

Follow us on Twitter

Get New ICB Posts by Email:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Today's Featured News & Posts

Our Recent Articles

Blogumulus by Roy Tanck and Amanda FazaniDistributed by CahayaBiru.com
.
.