Showing posts with label Chuck Hustmyre. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Chuck Hustmyre. Show all posts


The friends and family of missing 5-year-old Haleigh Cummings would make the subject of a great farce if the situation weren't so tragic.

Rarely outside of an episode of Jerry Springer can you find a more pathetic group of white trash trailer dwellers. Their personal stories and intertwined relationships would provide perfect grist for any comedy writer's efforts to create purposely exaggerated characterizations and ludicrous, improbable situations in order to satirize or poke fun at the uneducated southern redneck subculture.

I could see this as part of the routine on the Blue Collar Comedy Tour or as a skit on Saturday Night Live. Or maybe a Will Ferrell movie.

For a movie, we have a great cast. The hero of this farce would be Ronald Cummings, the 25-year-old father of the missing child and a petty criminal, also a gun-toting, goateed, tattooed, earring-wearing former crane operator, who drives a pickup truck and recently got in a fight with guy whom he claims stole his gun.

As the villain, you've got 17-year-old Misty Croslin-Cummings, soon to be just plain Misty Croslin again. Before the opening credits she's the babysitter for Ronald's two young children, but soon she realizes that Ronald's doublewide is a socio-economic step up, so she starts working full time around Ronald's house and in his bed. Soon she's not just the live-in nanny, she's the live-in girlfriend.

Shortly after the opening scene in which Haleigh disappears, Misty marries her prince charming and becomes Mrs. Cummings. But now, just past the midpoint of the plot, Ronald says he plans to dump his wife of seven months and start dating again.

(As a brief aside, I've seen several pictures of Misty and I swear she looks like the product of at least a couple generations of brothers and sisters mating.)

A third main character could be "White Boy Greg," a local drug dealer who says that the weekend before Haleigh disappeared he was using drugs, drinking, partying, and doing the nasty with Misty Croslin-soon-to-be-Cummings.

Then there's the supporting cast of step siblings, half-siblings (possibly even quarter siblings), cousins, step parents, biological parents (a.k.a. sperm donors and birth mothers), friends, lawyers, PR people, and even a bounty hunter or two, most of whom look and act as inbred as Misty, and all of whom have a standing invitation to appear on the Nancy Grace show.

What gets lost in the tale of who in the cast slept with whom, who used drugs with whom, who's related to whom, and who had a threesome with his sister and his second cousin once removed, is the fact that Haleigh Cummings, who certainly didn't choose to be born into this family of miscreants, is still missing and very likely dead.

Haleigh Cummings deserves justice.

Misty Croslin-Cummings-Croslin (a.k.a. Ima Scumbag) knows what happened to that little girl. Her story about the circumstances of Haleigh's disappearance has been proven to be a lie.

Her own brother, Hank Croslin, (who was recently in jail for grand theft auto) says he went to Ronald and Misty's trailer the night Haleigh disappeared and banged on the door but got no answer. That's because Misty wasn't home watching the kids like she told the police and Nancy Grace a hundred times.

Cell phone records show that Ronald called Misty several times that night but couldn't reach her. Then he called Hank Croslin and asked him to go to the trailer and check on Misty and his kids. But no one was there.
With just that piece of information now available to the detectives investigating Haleigh's disappearance, why Misty is not sitting in jail is something I just can't fathom. She has given numerous statements to the police that contain provable lies. Those lies led investigators in the wrong direction. That is illegal.

Misty needs to be in jail.

The most recent story, from a jailhouse snitch (probably another Cummings or Croslin relative), is that Misty took the kids to a party and that Haleigh got her little hands on some Oxycontin and died from an overdose. White Boy Greg is alleged to have dumped the 5-year-old's body somewhere.

That story has the ring of truth. Except that I doubt Haleigh accidentally took Oxycontin. It seems more likely that Misty gave Haleigh and her little brother, Ronald Jr., something to knock them out.

After all, Misty was supposed to be home watching the kids while Ronald worked the night shift. Haleigh, at 5, might have mentioned to her daddy that Misty took them to a party at someone else's house (trailer, RV, or camper, wherever these white trash dirtbags go to party), so Misty probably had to knock them out first to make sure they slept through the party and couldn't later tell dear old dad about their nocturnal adventures.


For dramatic effect, I'll say it again: Given that Putnam County Sheriff's officials now admit they know for a fact that Misty's story about what happened the night Haleigh disappeared is a flat out lie, Misty needs to be in jail.

So why isn't she?

Chuck Hustmyre is an award winning crime reporter and the author of the Penguin true crime books Killer with a Badge and An Act of Kindness, and the novel House of the Rising Sun. For more information, visit his Web site www.chuckhustmyre.com.

Sphere: Related Content
read more “The Haleigh Cummings Case: Liars, Scumbags, and Nancy Grace”

By Chuck Hustmyre

Did you hear that? It was Drew Peterson's rear-end clamping shut. Guys call it the "pucker factor." It happens when you get really nervous, and former Bolingbrook, Illinois Police Sergeant Drew Peterson has a lot to be nervous about.

He's in jail with a $20 million bond, awaiting trial for the murder of his third ex-wife, Kathleen Savio, whose body was found in 2004 in the bathtub of the home the couple once shared, and he is suspected by just about everyone of killing his fourth wife, Stacy Peterson, who disappeared without a trace on Oct. 28, 2007.

The reason for Peterson's sudden puckering has got to be a recent jury decision in faraway Georgia.

On Sept. 3, a jury in LaFayette, Georgia found former local Police Sergeant Sam Parker guilty of murdering his wife, Theresa Parker.

Theresa Parker, a 911 dispatcher, was last seen leaving her sister's house on March 21, 2007. At the time of her disappearance, she was separated from her husband and moving out of their home.

As in the Peterson case, Sam Parker--a 25-year police veteran--initially cooperated with investigators and claimed his wife had run off, probably with another man. Also like Drew Peterson, Sam Parker had a history of domestic abuse.

Although Theresa Parker's body was not found, a grand jury, and later a petite jury, was convinced that Sam Parker murdered his wife.

Parker was sentenced to life in prison.

So what does that mean for Drew Peterson? Maybe nothing. Maybe an awful lot.

Prosecutors in Illinois potentially get two whacks at him.

A lengthy grand jury investigation into the deaths of both Mrs. Petersons resulted in only one murder indictment, for the death of wife number three, Kathleen Savio.

Savio's death was initially ruled an accident, but after the exhumation of her remains in 2007, two new autopsies--one by renowned forensic pathologist Dr. Michael Baden--reclassified her death as a homicide.

"I don't think there's any possibility this was an accident, and I don't think there's any indication this was suicide," Dr. Baden told Fox News's Greta Van Susteren. "It's my opinion, to a reasonable degree of medical certainty, that it's a homicide."

Prosecutors could go after Drew Peterson again for the disappearance and presumed death of Stacy Peterson. Depending on what happens at his upcoming trial, Peterson may find himself in the dock facing a second murder charge.

For more information on the Drew Peterson case, read my truTV story.

Chuck Hustmyre is an award winning crime reporter and the author of the Penguin true crime books Killer with a Badge and An Act of Kindness, and the novel House of the Rising Sun. For more information, visit his Web site www.chuckhustmyre.com.

Sphere: Related Content
read more “Drew Peterson's 'Pucker Factor'”

By Chuck Hustmyre

Where's Nancy now? Nancy Pelosi I mean. I want to hear more about the "culture of corruption."

Last week a jury convicted nine-term Congressman William "Cold Cash" Jefferson on 11 of 16 felony corruption charges. The 94-page indictment including charges of bribery, fraud, and money laundering.

Since Jefferson didn't take the stand in his own defense -- something viewed almost universally outside of a courtroom as a tacit admission of guilt -- we never got to hear the "honorable explanation" he promised us of why the FBI found $90,000 in marked bribe money wrapped in tinfoil and stuffed inside his freezer.

In Sept. 2005, when the Democrats were tearing out their hair and gnashing their teeth over President George Bush's slow federal (read "racist") response to the devastation in New Orleans following Hurricane Katrina, Bill Jefferson -- once a paragon of Democratic virtue -- diverted scarce National Guard troops and vehicles from rescue missions and ordered them to drive him to his house so he could recover a laptop computer, three suitcases, and a large box (probably stuffed with cash from his freezer).

The guilty verdict came back last week with little fanfare from the national press, at least not nearly as much as Senator Larry "Toe Tapper" Craig received, and certainly not as much as Texas Congressman Tom DeLay got, the original Pelosi poster child for the "culture of corruption." DeLay has had an indictment hanging over his head for almost five years but hasn't been convicted of anything.

The Democratic Party owns -- with few exceptions -- the national press, and although the press had to report on Jefferson's trial, there was a not-so-curious lack of glee in its reporting, as there would have been had the defendant been a Republican.

The FBI began investigating Jefferson under the Bush administration, and you can bet that the Bureau won't do anything like that again during Obama's two, three or four terms in office. (Haven't you heard that at least one congressman has introduced legislation to repeal the 22nd Amendment, the one that limits a president to two terms?)

To deny that Democrats use the indictment process to weaken Republicans running for re-election is to deny the obvious. Look at the case of Republican Senator Ted Stevens of Alaska. After indicting and convicting the powerful senator just before the 2008 election, the Democrats got a double play. They put another Democrat in the Senate and they further weakened Sarah Palin, whom they feared as a potential rival to Barack Obama in 2012.

The case against Stevens was so obviously trumped up that even Attorney General Eric Holder (Obama's grand inquisitor) had to ask the court to vacate the conviction. Now the Justice Department is investigating the prosecutors in the Stevens case with an eye toward putting them in prison.

No matter, though. The objective was achieved. Republican Stevens is out of the Senate and Democrat Mark Begich is in.

Last weekend I read this headline: "AP INVESTIGATION: SC gov's plane use questioned"

At the time I had no idea who the governor of South Carolina was, but I knew one thing for certain, based simply on the headline: Whoever he or she was, the governor was a Republican, probably one who had been mentioned in national circles as a potential Obama opponent.

I was certain of the governor's political affiliation because the AP does not investigate Democrats, especially not in the age of Obama.

Democrats, you see, are above investigation because their motives are pure. In many cases, they're actually above the law. Again, due to the purity of their motives.

They don't even have to pay taxes, just impose them.

Congressman Charlie Rangel from New York is the Democratic head of the powerful House Ways and Means Committee, the committee that sets tax policy in the United States, yet he's under investigation for dodging his personal income taxes for years.

Why hasn't House Speaker Nancy Pelosi replaced Rangel as head of the committee, at least temporarily until the "investigation" is complete and all the "facts" are in? Could it be that Pelosi already knows the outcome of the "investigation," which, after all, is being conducted by the House Ethics Committee, run by Pelosi's handpicked minions?

So the head of the committee that writes U.S. tax law is a likely tax cheat, who is quite possibly criminally liable for evading federal income taxes, but what about the man charged with enforcing U.S. tax laws -- Secretary of the Treasury Tim Geithner.

Unfortunately, Geithner is a tax cheat too. But when he got caught owing $34,000 in unpaid taxes, the White House called it an "honest mistake."

Using the White House's fuzzy logic, I guess in some situations, bank robbery could be considered "an honest withdrawal error."

But where is Nancy in all of this? Where are the calls for special prosecutors, sweeping investigations, and public lynchings ... I mean hearings?

I've heard that Madam Nancy has had trouble scheduling special military jets to fly her back and forth between Washington, D.C. and San Francisco, so now Congress is considering buying a fleet of jets to fly important members of Congress around the country on "business."

Didn't Big Brother Obama recently chide corporate executives for flying around in private jets? I guess it's different when you're doing the people's business.

Indeed, there is a culture of corruption in D.C. and I think it starts at the very top.

Not satisfied with hijacking just the judiciary, the Democrats have now hijacked the entire criminal justice system. Lady Justice may be blind, but now she's a registered Democrat.

Chuck Hustmyre is an award winning crime reporter and the author of the Penguin true crime books Killer with a Badge and An Act of Kindness, and the novel House of the Rising Sun. For more information, visit his Web site www.chuckhustmyre.com.

Sphere: Related Content
read more “High Crimes and Misdemeanors”

After years of writing nothing but true crime, I've turned my hand again to fiction. Nobel and Pulitzer nominated novelist and short story writer Ernest Gaines once told me, "You can tell more truth with fiction than you can with nonfiction."


Recently, I completed my second novel, A Killer Like Me. My agent, Scott Gould of RLR Associates in New York City, is submitting the novel to several big editors. I have my fingers crossed. Meanwhile, I'm working on a third. It pays to have a backup plan.

Here, submitted for your perusal, is the first chapter of my recently completed novel.

A KILLER LIKE ME

CHAPTER 1

"He who fights with monsters should be careful lest he thereby become a monster. And if thou gaze long into an abyss, the abyss will also gaze into thee." --Friedrich Nietzsche, Beyond Good and Evil

NEW ORLEANS -- 2:30 p.m.

The woman's body lay sprawled on the grimy floor. She was naked, her arms extended, legs spread. Dried blood caked her crotch. More blood had leaked onto the floor and formed a gooey puddle under her buttocks.

Homicide detectives Sean Murphy and Juan Gaudet stood near the dead woman's feet, looking down at her.

"He hurt her before he killed her," Murphy said.

Gaudet nodded. "Looks that way." He let out a deep breath. "You think it's our guy?"

"She's got ligature marks on her neck."

"But no plastic cable tie," Gaudet said.

Murphy took a careful step toward the woman's head and leaned forward to get a better look at her neck. The ligature contained tiny ridge impressions, like those found on a cable tie. "He must have cut it off."

"But why?" Gaudet said. "He left them on the other victims."

"It's him."

"What makes you so sure?"

"I got a feeling."

"You got a feeling?" Gaudet said, an edge of sarcasm in his voice to let his partner know he wasn't buying it.

Murphy nodded. "It feels like our guy. The way he put her on display, right in the middle of the dance floor. She looks like she's been sacrificed on an altar."

"The other ones weren't posed."

"They just weren't this obvious," Murphy said, "but I bet if we go back and look at the crime scene photos, we'll see it."

"Like one of those pictures you stare at until you see the hidden image?"

Murphy ignored the question as he stepped over the victim's outstretched left arm and squatted beside her head. Staring at the dead woman's face, he said, "He's getting more into the act itself. He likes it. He's gaining confidence and developing into a more sophisticated killer."

The crime scene was inside an old club on North Rampart Street called the Destiny Lounge, a black juke joint a few blocks from Elysian Fields Avenue, in the Upper 9th Ward. The club had been closed since Katrina. For a long time after the storm, the Destiny Lounge had been a place where bums took a shit and junkies came to get high. Several months back the city finally boarded up the doors and windows.

Murphy stood and shined his flashlight at the ceiling, amazed that the mirrored disco ball still hung over the dance floor.

An overweight uniformed cop stood just inside the half-open front door. Murphy recognized him but couldn't remember his name. "Who called it in?" Murphy asked.

"Anonymous 9-1-1 call," the fat cop said.

"Some dope fiend would be my guess," Gaudet offered.

"A dope fiend with a conscience?" Murphy asked.

"I bet he fucked her first."

"The killer?"

"No," Gaudet said. "The 9-1-1 caller."

"She's kind of ripe."

"Still, piece of ass lying there like that, these junkies don't care. I bet there's more than one sperm sample in her -- one from the killer, one from the caller."

"She's a twenty-five dollar crackwhore," Murphy said, "which means we're probably going to find a whole sperm bank inside of her." He shined his flashlight around the bar. The dead woman's clothes were gone.

Outside, the late July sun beat down on the city through a cloudless sky. The heat radiating inside the sealed building was so thick Murphy felt like he could set his notepad and flashlight on top of it. Sweat ran down his face. His shirt and suit coat were stuck to his back.

Hardly any of that blinding sunlight, though, penetrated the tomb-like interior of the bar. The plywood covering the club's doors and windows hadn't keep out the victim, or the killer, or the transient who found the body, but it kept out the light. The only ambient illumination came from the halfway propped open front door.

"How'd the first officers get in?" Gaudet asked the fat uniform cop.

The patrolman pointed toward a back room. "A door in there has been pried off the hinges. It's leaning up against the frame, but it's pretty easy to move."

"Is that how you got in?" Murphy asked.

The cop nodded.

"What about the front door?"

"It was chained shut from the inside. We used a tire tool to bust open the padlock so we could get some light in here, and some fresh air."

Gaudet turned to his partner. "You're the Homicide Division's expert on dead women. How long do you think she's been here?"

Murphy painted the body with his flashlight. Then he took a big whiff of the air. "I'd say at least two days."

The front door banged open as a uniformed sergeant took a half step into the building. "Hey, Murph ... " The sergeant looked around like someone who had just walked into a dark movie theater. "Where the hell are you?"

Murphy waved his flashlight. "Right here."

"Coroner's man says it'll be at least an hour before he can get here. They're pulling a floater out of the river by the French Market. The body got hung up on a pylon."

"Male or female?"

"Female."

"A local girl?"

The sergeant shook his head. "Tourist. They already got her I-D'd. Her boyfriend reported her missing yesterday. He said they were having sex on that old pier up by the zoo. Somehow she fell in. I guess she couldn't swim."

Great, Murphy thought. Another hour standing around inside a sauna with a rotting corpse. By law, even Homicide couldn't move a body until the coroner's investigator got to the scene.

He and Gaudet went back to examining the victim.

She was black, twenty to twenty-five years old, and badly swollen. Her tongue was the color of chocolate syrup. Her eyes were open and bulging out of her face. The whites had turned dark from the burst blood vessels.

Textbook strangulation.

The ligature marks, the bruising left by whatever had been used to choke her, looked like they encircled her neck. When the coroner's investigator got there, they could roll the body and be sure, but Murphy was betting she had been strangled with a cable tie.

The woman had been skinny but the stretch marks on her belly and hips indicated she'd had at least one child. Scabs and needle marks dotted her arms and legs. Three of the fingernails on her right hand were broken.

She fit the profile of the others. Six previous murders in twelve months, all fairly young, all prostitutes, all victims the department brass called women with high-risk lifestyles. All but the first had been strangled with heavy-duty cable ties, thick plastic bands with a one-way ratcheted lock on one end that tightens but doesn't loosen. The only way to remove a cable tie once it's on is to cut it off.

"What are you thinking?" Gaudet said.

Murphy shook his head to clear it. He'd been staring down into the dead girl's blood-soaked eyes, but there wasn't anything behind them. Everything she had ever been, every dream she'd ever had, every memory -- good, bad, or ugly -- was gone. Nobody starts out in life wanting to be a junkie prostitute, but that's all this poor woman would be remembered as, assuming she was remembered at all. But even if she wasn't, she would exist forever in the files of the New Orleans Police Department as a dead hooker, murder number one hundred and something, whatever the count was up to as of this afternoon.

"Hey, partner," Gaudet said, "don't get too wrapped up in this shit. It's just another case."

Murphy looked at him. "You think they'll finally admit it?"

"Your serial killer theory?"

"I think we're past the theory part."

"Brother, you had me convinced after murder number three," Gaudet said. "But I'm not in charge. I just work here."

"I'm going to talk to the captain again. We need a task force. We need resources. If we don't catch this guy, he's going to keep going and going."

Gaudet's laugh sounded like the bark of a hyena. "Just like the bunny."

Murphy cracked a smile. "Yeah, just like the Energizer bunny."

***

Crime scene techs took pictures of the dead woman and the inside of the bar. They also measured how far the body was from fixed objects around the room, and from the back door, the most likely point of entry. They plotted the distances and directions on a diagram. Forty-eight feet separated the back door from the woman's body.

While everyone waited for the coroner's investigator to show up, Murphy managed to talk one of the techs, a woman whom he guessed weighed about 130 pounds, into letting him drag her around on the floor. Murphy paced off fifty feet of floor, on the opposite side of the club from the back door and the victim's body, then asked the tech to lie on her back. He dragged her one way, then dragged her back. After a little experimentation, he found out it was easiest to pull her by her feet.

"Not this method acting shit again," Gaudet said as he watched his partner drag the crime scene tech across the filthy dance floor.

Breathing hard, Murphy said, "It works, I'm telling you. You get inside a person's head and you can figure out how and why he does what he does."

"How do you know he dragged her? He could have carried her."

"They call it dead weight for a reason," Murphy said. "If he choked her unconscious while they were outside, he had to get her in here somehow. Lifting and carrying an unconscious or dead adult by yourself, even a female, is nearly impossible."

"You carry a lot of unconscious or dead women, do you?"

"If you don't believe me," Murphy pointed to the crime scene tech lying at his feet, "try carrying her from the back door to here."

"He ain't carrying me nowhere," the tech said. "That's enough of this bullshit."

"Maybe they walked in together," Gaudet said.

"Could be, but I don't picture our guy as a smooth talker. He's not Ted Bundy." Murphy stared at their victim for a half-minute. "I picture him as shy around women. I think he approached her on the street, tells her what he wants. They make a deal, he shows her some money. Then they go down the side of the building or come around the back to take care of business. But he grabs her and chokes her out, or maybe he slugs her with something. Either way, he brings her in here unconscious. There's no way she comes in here willingly just to have sex. This place is too nasty, even for a crackwhore."

"He would've had to know he could get inside."

"He scouted it out ahead of time. He was probably the one who took the door off the hinges." Murphy looked down at the crime scene tech still lying on the floor. "Can you check the hinges and the pins to see if there are any fresh tool marks? I want to know if they look like they've been taken apart recently."

"Can I get up now?"

Murphy ignored her. "We need more light in here. This dance floor is covered in grime. If he dragged her in here, she would have left a trail, maybe even some hair. Look for shoe impressions, too."

The crime scene tech held her hand up to Murphy. "Are you going to help me up?"

***

It was almost five o'clock when the coroner's investigator showed up. By that time Murphy was so hot he had stopped sweating. From his Boy Scout days he seemed to remember that was one of the signs of heat exhaustion, or heat stroke, heat something.

The dead prostitute -- he and Gaudet had already decided that's what she was -- had no pockets to empty, nor possessions to catalogue. Nothing but injuries to document and photograph.

The coroner's investigator examined the woman's body by flashlight. He started with her scalp and began working his way toward her toes. He stopped halfway. Murphy, who was looking over the investigator's shoulder, saw the tip of a dark object protruding from the woman's rectum. "What is that?" Murphy said.

The investigator angled his head down for a better look. "I don't know."

"Guess."

The man flicked at the object with a latex-covered fingernail. It clinked. "Sounds like glass."

"Glass?"

The investigator probed with his finger, then nodded. "It feels like a bottle." He cast a quick glance around the abandoned bar. "Probably a beer bottle."

"The whole thing?"

"That'd be my guess. The tapered neck would make insertion a little easier, but we'll have to wait until the autopsy to remove it."

"That's a new twist," Gaudet said, "sodomizing her like that." He looked at Murphy. "None of the others had anything like that done to them." He paused for several seconds. "You still think it's your guy?"

"He's not my guy. He's our guy?"

"You know what I mean."

"Yeah, I think it's our guy. He's just ratcheting things up a notch and getting off on causing more pain. Maybe that's why the cable tie is gone. Maybe he cut if off so he could keep her alive while he tortured her."

"He must have left something behind," Gaudet said. "He either raped her, or jacked off on her, or licked her, or maybe he just jizzed on the floor. One way or the other, though, he had to have left some DNA behind."

"Don't you think he knows about DNA?" Murphy said.

"Maybe he's not a CSI fan."

"He hasn't left any yet."

Gaudet pointed to the body. "He's never done this before, either. You said he's ratcheting things up and getting off on what he's doing."

"We'll see," Murphy said, though he didn't believe they would find anything. This killer was too smart for that.

Gaudet shuffled his feet around like he was suddenly uncomfortable.

"What's wrong?" Murphy said.

"When are you going to talk to the captain?"

Murphy glanced at his watch. "Tonight," he said. "I'm going to catch him before he leaves the office."

"He's already told you no, twice I think. You keep fucking with him, he's going to see to it you get fired ... again."

"Maybe." Murphy looked around the filthy, abandoned bar, then back down at the dead woman. "But I'll do whatever it takes to catch this sick bastard."



Sphere: Related Content
read more “O fiction, fiction, wherefore art thou, fiction?”

"The corpse of a murdered man can lie in a New Orleans street for three days without the citizens paying it the slightest notice," a visitor from New England wrote to his wife in 1849 while on a visit to New Orleans. "Only the odor of decomposition stirs them into action."

Things are not much different today.

According to the FBI, New Orleans is once again the murder capital of the United States. With 179 murders and an FBI estimated post-Katrina population of just under 282,000 people, the murder rate in New Orleans was a staggering 64 killings per 100,000 residents, more than 10 times the national average.

St. Louis, Missouri, the No. 2 deadliest city in America, had 47 murders per 100,000.

The No. 3 most murderous city in the country, Baltimore, had 37 murders per 100,000 residents. Compared to New Orleans, Baltimore, the setting for the critically-acclaimed television series Homicide: Life on the Street, and the bestselling nonfiction book Homicide: A Year on the Killing Streets, by former Baltimore Sun crime reporter David Simon, looks like Andy Griffith's Mayberry.

In typical New Orleans fashion, the mayor, Ray "Chocolate City" Nagin -- who is right now quarantined in China with his wife and a bodyguard after a possible exposure to swine flu -- and the woefully under-qualified chief of police, Warren Riley, can only point to the FBI's population estimate and cry "Foul."

The U.S. Census Bureau, in an effort to help the foundering city save some shred of its reputation, upped its population estimate for 2008 to 312,000. Using that generous guess at the city's population, the homicide rate in New Orleans drops to a mere 57 murders per 100,000 people, somewhere around nine times the national average, but still 21 percent higher than its closest competitor, St. Louis.

So using either population estimate, New Orleans wins hands down as the most violent city in America, and the third most violent in the world, according to Foreign Policy Magazine.

Meanwhile, the mayor and the police chief are touting the drop in the number of murders from 210 in 2007 to just 179 in 2008, and a reduction in reported armed robberies from 948 to 902. Overall, city officials claim a 17 percent reduction in violent crime from 2007 to 2008.

That's like plugging 17 percent of the gash in the side of the Titanic moments before it plunged to the bottom of the Atlantic.

Mayor Nagin even went so far as to brag during his most recent State of the City address that violent crime in New Orleans has dropped 75 percent since the city notched 421 murders in 1994.

Of course, his honor the mayor neglected to mention that Hurricane Katrina slashed the city's population by two-thirds in 2005 and that even now, four years after the storm of the century, barely 60 percent of the city's residents have returned. In addition to blowing an ocean of water into the city under the sea, Katrina's furious winds scattered New Orleans's criminal population across the south, to places like Houston, Dallas, and Atlanta, where some chose to stay, some went to jail, and some died.

So far this year, about 90 people have been murdered in New Orleans. At that rate, the city is on pace to break last year's record setting body count.

The heart of the New Orleans economy -- tourism -- is bleeding out faster than the bodies of the city's murder victims because of the perception that New Orleans is a violent and lawless place.

Guess what? It is.

The French Quarter used to be relatively safe, compared to other sections of the city. But not anymore. Last summer I was in the lower Quarter with my girlfriend to interview Thom Kahler, a retired newspaperman who lives in the French Quarter and now runs a blog about crime called N.O. Crimeline.

I was working on a story for Psychology Today about armed robbery. We met up with Thom at Lafitte's Blacksmith Shop, one of the oldest bars in the country. I found out a few days later that as my girlfriend and I left Lafitte's, thugs robbed a man and a woman two blocks on one side of us, and another couple got robbed two blocks on the other side of us.

With most of the city's housing projects closed down, the thugs have no place to hang out, so they go downtown.

The French Quarter has become a very dangerous place.

The mayor and police chief can deny it all they want, but unless they take serious action, like was taken in 1995, New Orleans is going to be the new Mogadishu. And unfortunately, the street cops of NOPD are going to be the Rangers.

Chuck Hustmyre is an award winning crime reporter and the author of the Penguin true crime books Killer with a Badge and An Act of Kindness, and the novel House of the Rising Sun. For more information, visit his Web site www.chuckhustmyre.com.

Sphere: Related Content
read more “NEW ORLEANS: Murder City”

By Chuck Hustmyre

The Rev. Olander Cassimere, 79, and his wife, Alphathada, 77, were found dead in their New Orleans home on Mother's Day, less than a week shy of their 55th wedding anniversary.

The Cassimere's evacuated their Lower 9th Ward home after Hurricane Katrina, but moved back at Olander's insistence. Alphathada said she was worried about crime. For Olander, the house the couple had owned since the 1950s was his part of the American dream.

Olander Cassimere was a Korean War veteran, a retired brick mason, and pastor of the Third Church of God in Christ. Alphathada sang solos before her husband's sermons. They didn't smoke, drink, or curse, according to their son, Olander Jr.

Sunday, someone broke into their home and shot them to death.

Police suspect it was a bloody act of witness intimidation. Last year one of Olander and Alphathada's grown grandchildren was kidnapped and almost killed. Police later arrested a suspect, whose trial was scheduled to begin Tuesday.

Before the murders, someone showed up at the Cassimere's home asking if they were the grandparents of the person who was kidnapped and who was going to testify at the upcoming trial. The visitor showed no identification. Nor did the person offer any explanation as to why he or she was making such inquiries. The visitor simply found out the elderly couple did, in fact, live at the home and left.

A few days later, Olander and Alphathada were dead. Police and relatives found no evidence of burglary, and the couple's adult autistic daughter, who was home when her parents were murdered, was left unharmed.

At noon on Sunday, New Orleans police re-arrested the kidnapping suspect, who had been out on bond wearing a GPS ankle bracelet.

I spent 20 years in police work and have seen plenty of horrendous crimes. As time goes on, the crimes seem to get worse -- more frequent, more senseless, more violent. You can't go anywhere these days without the threat of someone killing you hanging over your head, whether you're at a Fourth of July fireworks display in Baton Rouge, strolling in the French Quarter, or behind the locked door of your own home, as the Cassimeres were last Sunday.

The specific fault for these daily acts of terrorism lies with the perpetrators, of course, but the general fault lies with us. We -- the citizens of the United States -- have created a legal system that caters to the criminals at the expense of the rest of us.

There is no Constitutional requirement that a jury be composed of 12 dunderheads who no nothing more than what they see on Oprah. There is no requirement that courts must find 12 people who have never been the victim of a crime, never known a policeman, never read the newspaper, never heard of the case in question.

The Constitution doesn't guarantee that the perpetrators of heinous crimes get their own state-funded army of lawyers, psychologists, psychiatrists, and social workers, or that criminals pass a battery of tests before justice can be meted out.

The Constitution doesn't require that convicted murderers be afforded the luxury of appealing their convictions and sentences, at taxpayer expense, for 10, 15, even 20 years.

No, the Constitution doesn't require it, but we have made it so. We have created a society in which two elderly people, who have offended no one, can be slain in their home and it barely gets noticed. The killers, if they are ever caught, will take years to prosecute, by which time they will have assembled a crowd of excuse makers and blamer-shifters who will work tirelessly to mitigate their culpability.

And if punishment ever does come, it will be slow and nearly painless, with cable TV and exercise equipment to ease the convicted killers' burden. And we will have long since forgotten the Cassimeres.

In one sense, we have created a colorblind society. There is no black and white, nothing but endless shades of gray. There is no right and wrong, nothing but endless excuses. And, of course, endless litigation.

I used to wonder when enough would be enough. When would we, the silent majority of law-abiding citizens, rise up and retake control of our own society? Now I realize enough is never enough. We will never rise up. We will never reclaim our cities or our streets. We will just add another layer of security as the darkness creeps closer. We will move a little farther out into the hinterland.

And that's too bad, because Olander and Alphathada deserved better. We deserve better.

CHUCK HUSTMYRE is an award winning crime reporter and the author of the Penguin true crime books Killer with a Badge and An Act of Kindness, and the novel House of the Rising Sun. For more information, visit his Web site www.chuckhustmyre.com.

Sphere: Related Content
read more “Enough is Never Enough”

By Chuck Hustmyre

Last week, a Tampa jury found Youssef Megahed not guilty of illegally transporting explosives across state lines. Meanwhile, his co-defendant, Ahmed Mohamed, who was arrested with Megahed in a car carrying low-grade explosives and PVC pipe -- the ingredients for pipe bombs -- and a self-made video on how to convert toy remote controls into remote bomb detonators, is serving a 15-year sentence after pleading guilty to providing support to terrorists.

Does anyone but me see a disconnect here? Is there a tear in the time-space continuum, maybe a rip in reality, or is it just me?

First, let me apologize if I sound somewhat like a broken record, but I think radical Islam is the greatest threat facing this country today. It is, quite simply, a fascist movement every bit as dangerous to the free world as Nazism or Communism.

Second, in an effort to blunt the vacuous charges of racism, bigotry, blasphemy, xenophobia, and the like that will surely accrue to me after publication of this post, let me say this: I have no problem with Islam or with most Muslims. I have a huge problem with radical Muslims who want to force their beliefs on me with gun barrels and bombs, and on those who want to kill non-Muslims for any of the myriad “insults” to Islam.

I’ve traveled to the Middle East with Muslims. I’ve been a guest and eaten in Muslim homes. I’ve visited Muslim schools. I know that not all Muslims are radicals, nor do most Muslims support terrorism.

Let’s just, for the sake of argument, say that 95 percent of Muslims abhor the wanton use of violence to promote or defend their religion. If you accept the figure that the world’s Muslim population is 1.4 billion, that leaves 70 million people who accept or promote the use of violence in furtherance of their religious beliefs.

I think I’m being generous with the five percent figure.

A 2007 report by the Pew Research Center found that although American Muslims were less likely to support violence than Muslims in other countries, more than 1 in 10 U.S. Muslims thinks suicide bombings against civilian targets are sometimes justified. For U.S Muslims under 30, the support for terrorism is even higher.

From the report:

"Younger Muslims in the U.S. are more willing to accept suicide bombing in the defense of Islam than are their older counterparts. Among Muslims younger than 30, for example, 15% say that suicide bombing can often or sometimes be justified."

The statistics accompanying the report are even more damning than the text suggests. According to the statistics, another 11 percent of Muslims in the U.S. under 30 said that suicide bombings of civilian targets could be justified on rare occasions.

According to the report, 26 percent of young Muslims in the U.S. -- more than 1 out of every 4 -- to some degree support suicide bombings. Only 69 percent said they were never justified, leaving open the possibility that at least 31 percent of U.S. Muslims under 30 support the murder of innocent people to “defend” Islam.

So it was against that backdrop that in 2007 -- the same year the Pew report was released -- that a pair of sheriff’s deputies near Goose Creek, South Carolina stopped Egyptian nationals Youssef Megahed and Ahmed Mohamed, just a few miles from the U.S. Navy’s Charleston Naval Weapons Station. A subsequent search of the car they were in, which belonged to Megahed’s brother, turned up a low-grade explosive compound of sugar and potassium nitrate, four PVC pipes, 20 feet of safety fuse, and several gallons of gasoline.

Megahed and Mohamed, both University of South Florida engineering students, claimed they were headed to the beach and that they were going to use the material in the trunk to make “sugar rockets.”

Not all uses of potassium nitrate and sugar are benign, however. According to a report by The Israel Project:

"In Dec. 2007, the IDF [Israeli Defense Forces] and Israel General Security Services (GSS – also known as the “Shin Bet” or “Shabak”) uncovered 6.5 tons of potassium nitrate hidden in sugar-sacks marked as humanitarian aid from the European Union. Potassium nitrate is used by terrorists for the manufacture of explosives and Qassam rockets."

According to the government’s plea agreement with Mohamed:

When the sheriff’s deputies approached the Toyota Camry in which the two Egyptian engineering students were riding, the deputies spotted Megahed, not Mohamed, disconnecting wires from a laptop computer, then tossing it into the back seat.

The laptop, it turned out, belonged to Mohamed and contained a 12-minute video in which Mohamed demonstrated how to turn remote controlled toy transmitters into bomb detonators. In the video, Mohamed explained, in Arabic, that the remote controlled detonators could be used to set off bombs from a safe distance instead of using suicide bombers.

On the video, which he uploaded to YouTube, Mohamed said:

“Instead of the brethren going to carry out martyrdom operations, may God bless him, he can use the explosion tools from distance and preserve his life, God willing, for the real battles.”

At Megahed’s trial, U.S. District Judge Steven D. Merryday barred the government from showing the jury the video. The judge also told prosecutors they couldn’t mention a 4 a.m. visit the pair made to Wal-Mart, where they attempted to buy a couple of high-powered rifles on their way to what Megahed’s defense attorney, Adam Allen, described to jurors as an “innocent weekend college road trip."

I’ve been to the beach a lot and never have I taken a low-grade explosive chemical compound and high-powered rifles.

As a retired federal agent, I’ve been involved in a lot of federal trials, so I can say with some authority that had those South Carolina cops arrested a pair of suspected bank robbers and found guns and cash in their car, it’s unlikely a judge would have ruled as inadmissible a demand note of the kind passed to bank tellers simply because it had been written by only one of the suspected robbers.

Because of the carping of the defense attorneys and the overabundance of caution on the part of Judge Merryday, probably out of fear of being called a racist, the jury didn’t get to hear all of the facts. They didn’t get to hear that Megahed’s jihadist buddy, Ahmed Mohamed, told investigators that “he considered the United States military, and those fighting with the United States military in Arab countries, to be invaders,” and that the purpose of his training video was to teach those planning on becoming suicide bombers “how to save themselves so they could continue to fight the invaders,” according to the plea agreement Mohamed signed.

Basically, what the jury got to hear was that a couple of racist cops were out trolling for new dark-skinned victims and stumbled upon two innocent Muslim college students on their way to the beach. Seeing the potential to get their names in the newspaper, the cops set up a frame-job and accused the two boys of being suicide bombers and graduates of al Qaeda High.

Since the non-guilty verdict, U.S. immigration officials have detained Megahed and are trying to deport him back to Egypt.

Naturally, the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) is crying about it.

CHUCK HUSTMYRE is an award winning crime reporter and the author of the Penguin true crime books Killer with a Badge and An Act of Kindness, and the novel House of the Rising Sun. For more information, visit his Web site www.chuckhustmyre.com.

Sphere: Related Content
read more “Florida Jury Lets Suspected Terrorist Go Free”

By Chuck Hustmyre

The city of Clearwater, Florida has declared war on art and the First Amendment by claiming that a mural depicting fish and a banner containing the text of the First Amendment on the side of a bait shop are illegal.

Herb and Lori Quintero invested everything they had in their new business, The Complete Angler, a fishing tackle and bait shop. The Quinteros took a ramshackle building that used to house a fruit stand and turned it into a smart-looking business that employs people and pays taxes.

As part of their million-dollar renovation, the Quinteros hired local artist Matt Evanson to paint a mural on one of the outside walls. The colorful mural depicts six species of Florida game fish. The Complete Angler doesn't sell fish. It sells fishing equipment, tackle, and live bait. It turns out, that is an important distinction.

City officials didn't like the mural. They said it violated the city's strict sign ordinance, which limits the size, placement, and content of commercial signage. The city fined the Quinteros $700 and ordered them to paint over the mural.

Last month, the Quinteros hung a banner containing the text of the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment over the mural. To the Quinteros, the action was a political protest.

To city officials, the First Amendment banner was a slap in the face, so they ramped up their attack on the Quinteros. The city ordered the Quinteros to take down the banner and paint over the mural or face a fine of $500 per day.

A fine of $500 a day for posting the First Amendment! Talk about irony.

City spokeswoman Joelle Castelli said the mural is not art. It's a sign that promotes the business. "If it was a mural of kids playing in a park, that would be acceptable," she said.

Ms. Castelli's use of the word acceptable is interesting. The First Amendment says:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Nowhere in the text of the First Amendment does the word "acceptable" appear. Under Ms. Castelli's interpretation, and by extension that of the city government of Clearwater, the First Amendment only protects speech (which includes works of art) that the government deems acceptable.

So I ask you, is that what the Founding Fathers meant? Did they write the First Amendment to protect government-accepted speech? Why would acceptable speech even need protection?

No, they wrote the First Amendment to protect controversial speech, speech government officials likely would find unacceptable.

Interestingly enough, several businesses in Clearwater have outside murals, yet they haven't felt the same heat from the city the Quinteros have. The city claims the mural on The Complete Angler promotes a product the business sells.

A Clearwater daycare center has a mural on an outside wall that depicts children playing, yet the city seems to find the daycare mural doesn't violate the sign ordinance because the mural doesn't promote the business's products.

Although it shouldn't be an issue, if the city wants to split hairs, The Complete Angler doesn't sell fish.

Fortunately for the Quinteros, the American Civil Liberties Union (with whom I rarely, if ever, agree) decided to take up their case. The Quinteros and the ACLU are seeking a federal injunction that will stop the city from further harassing them while they pursue a lawsuit in federal court.

At a hearing last week before a federal magistrate, city planning director Michael Delk admitted that had the Quinteros put up an American flag instead of the First Amendment, the city would not have had the authority to order them to remove it.

Although Delk acknowledged both the American flag and the First Amendment are symbols of the United States, the flustered bureaucrat couldn't explain why he felt the city could order the removal of one but not the other.

For more information on the Quinteros battle with BIG BROTHER, visit www.keepthefish.com.


CHUCK HUSTMYRE is an award winning crime reporter and the author of the Penguin true crime books Killer with a Badge and An Act of Kindness, and the novel House of the Rising Sun. For more information, visit http://www.chuckhustmyre.com/.

Sphere: Related Content
read more “Florida City Declares Fish Mural and Display of First Amendment a 'Crime'”

By Chuck Hustmyre

If the United Nations gets its way later this month, criticizing Islam in any of the world body's member nations will be a crime.

Ramping up its attack on critics of radical Islam, the U.N. Human Rights Council reportedly will try to make its annual resolution against religious defamation binding on all member nations.

Technically, the U.N. resolution, titled "Combating Defamation of Religions," would criminalize criticism of any religion, but the document mentions only one religion -- Islam.

In fact, the original draft of the resolution, first introduced in 1999 and passed every year since, was titled "Defamation of Islam."

The current resolution urges all member states to enact laws banning blasphemy and religious defamation, yet it doesn't define those terms. Blasphemy, it seems, is in the mind of the beholder, a situation that seems ripe for stifling free speech. If approved at the council's nearly month-long March meeting in Geneva, the new resolution would require member nations -- including the United States -- to enact such laws.

In December, the U.N. General Assembly, pushed by the 57-member Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC), passed a non-binding version of the resolution. When the resolution was introduced, Pakistan’s Ambassador, Masood Khan, perhaps hinting at things to come, told the Human Rights Council that the OIC wants to see a “new instrument or convention” that addresses the issue of blasphemy, one that would be binding on member states, according to Canwest News Service.

On Feb. 25, CNN's Lou Dobbs reported that the United Nations will seek to impose its religious defamation resolution on all of its members.

"The United Nations has adopted what it calls a Resolution to Combat Defamation of Religion," Dobbs said. "The U.N. now wants to make that anti-blasphemy resolution binding on member nations, including, of course, our own. That would make it a crime in the United States ... to criticize religion, in particular, Islam."

Floyd Abrams, a constitutional lawyer, told CNN, "What they would do would be to make it illegal to put out a movie or write a book or a poem that somebody could say was defamatory of Islam."

Critics charge that the OIC's membership, which includes Iran, Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Saudi Arabia, reads like a Who's Who of religious intolerance. The real purpose of the resolution, critics say, isn't to protect religion but to silence any criticism of Islam.

Many OIC members are absolutely brutal in their treatment of those who "insult" Islam. Saudi Arabia, for example, has its own religious police force that cracks down on those who violate the Kingdom's hyper-strict Islamic dress and behavior codes.

In early February, members of Saudi Arabia's Commission for Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice arrested a married 37-year-old American businesswoman and mother of three for sitting inside a Starbucks coffee shop with a male colleague, according to The Times Online.

"The religious police took (the woman's) mobile phone, pushed her into a cab and drove her to Malaz prison in Riyadh," the article said. "She was interrogated, strip-searched and forced to sign and fingerprint a series of confessions pleading guilty to her 'crime.'"

The Kingdom's strict Islamic-based legal code does not allow women to drive cars, nor is it legal for non-Muslims to enter the holy city of Mecca.

Saudi Arabia doesn't take any action, though, against Muslims who "insult" Christianity or Judaism.

Afghanistan and some other OIC member nations impose the death penalty on Muslims who renounce the faith and convert to another religion. There is no punishment for those who convert to Islam.

In late 2007, the government of Sudan sentenced a female British teacher to a public beating for allowing her Muslim students to name a stuffed animal Muhammad. The Sudanese government claimed naming a stuffed animal after the prophet was blasphemy.

A copy of the United Nations resolution dated Nov. 12, 2008 shows just how Islamic-centric it is. The resolution says the U.N. General Assembly, "Notes with deep concern ... the ethnic and religious profiling of Muslim minorities in the aftermath of the tragic events of 11 September 2001."

In the document, the United Nations also, "Expresses deep concern ... that Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism."

February marked the 20-year anniversary of the death fatwa issued against British author Salman Rushdie, whose 1989 novel The Satanic Verses earned the ire of Iran's Ayatollah Khomeini, who ordered that any "good" Muslim should kill Rushdie on sight.

In a 2007 letter to the U.N. General Assembly, the International Humanist and Ethical Union called the anti-blasphemy resolution "unnecessary, flawed, and morally wrong."

In the letter, the Amsterdam-based human rights group expressed its concern that "during debates on the defamation of religions, the focus has been almost entirely on Islam. There is a tendency to ignore anti-Semitism."

Critics say that although the religious defamation resolutions are not yet binding on U.N. member nations, the campaign to stamp out any criticism of Islam is having an effect.

In February, police in Kolkata, Indian arrested the editor and the publisher of the respected English-language newspaper The Statesman after they reprinted a British newspaper article titled "Why Should I Respect These Oppressive Religions?"

The article, which led with the sentence, "The right to criticize religion is being slowly doused in acid," was critical of the intolerance of the world's three dominate religions -- Christianity, Judaism, and Islam.

After several days of Muslim rioting, police charged the newspaper executives with "hurting the religious feelings" of Muslims.

Last year in the United States, book publishing giant Random House canceled its planned publication of the novel "The Jewel of Medina," which told the story of one of the Prophet Muhammad's many wives. In a written statement Random House said part of the reason it decided not to publish the novel was because company executives feared the book might offend Muslims and incite some of them to "acts of violence."

In the last couple of years, school administrators at the University of Michigan caved in to pressure from the Muslim Student Association and spent taxpayer money to install foot baths in restrooms so Muslim students could wash their feet before prayers. At Harvard, the school changed its long-standing co-ed gym policy to exclude men during certain hours so as not to offend Muslim students.

Legal experts in the United States say religious defamation laws as vague as those the United Nations wants to impose on its members stand little chance of success because of the free speech protections guaranteed under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

We'll see.

UPDATE:
Dubai, March 13, 2009 (The Daily Telegraph) -- A BRITISH mother of two is being held in jail after being found guilty of adultery - for having a cup of tea with a male friend.

Marnie Pearce, 40, had separated from her Egyptian husband Ihab El-Labban when he burst into her Dubai home and found her drinking tea with another man.

Mr El-Labban now has custody of their two children - Ziad, 4, and Laith, 7 - and former classroom assistant Ms Pearce fears she may never see them again because she will be deported as soon as she is released. (Read the rest of the story here.)


Kabul, 9 March (AKI) - Afghanistan's Supreme Court has upheld a 20-year jail term for blasphemy handed to Afghan journalist Sayed Parwez Kambakhsh, who claimed men and women were equal. Kambakhsh's brother said the family had just learned of the closed-door ruling delivered a month ago in the absence of Yaqub Kambakhsh, his lawyer or family members, the Information Safety and Freedom media watchdog reported on Monday. (Read the rest of the story here.)

Saudi Arabia, March 9, 2009 (CNN) -- A Saudi Arabian court has sentenced a 75-year-old Syrian woman to 40 lashes, four months imprisonment and deportation from the kingdom for having two unrelated men in her house, according to local media reports. (Read the rest of the story here.)

CHUCK HUSTMYRE is an award winning crime reporter and the author of the Penguin true crime books Killer with a Badge and An Act of Kindness, and the novel House of the Rising Sun. For more information, visit http://www.chuckhustmyre.com/.

Sphere: Related Content
read more “U.N. Tries To Make Criticizing Islam a Crime”

By Chuck Hustmyre

BUFFALO, NY -- Two days before Valentine's Day, the founder and chief executive of a Muslim cable network cut off his wife's head in what appears to be another Muslim "honor killing."

Muzzammil Hassan, 44, who immigrated to the U.S. from Pakistan 25 years ago, turned himself in to police a few hours after allegedly murdering his wife. According to a police spokesman, Hassan told the officers he had left his wife's body at the office of his television network in the village of Orchard Park.

The murder happened less than a week after Hassan's wife, Aasiya Z. Hassan, 37, obtained a protective order that forced her husband out of the couple's home. According to Aasiya's attorney, Hassan had a history of violence against his wife.

Hassan founded Bridges TV in 2004, according to MSNBC, with the intention that the new network "would help portray Muslims in a more positive light."

The slogan for the TV network, which never attracted an audience, was "Connecting people through understanding."

Perhaps a better slogan would have been "Confirming stereotypes through violence."

A 2004 article titled "Muslims in America Reach Out," that ran on the Web site of Voice of America, said, "Mr. Hassan hopes Bridges TV lives up to its name by uniting American Muslims and by helping non-Muslims overcome the negative images they may have of both Muslims and Islam."

Evidently, Hassan didn't think "honor killings" created a negative image of Muslims and Islam.

According to the United Nations, as many as 5,000 women and girls are murdered worldwide each year in so-called honor killings, almost all of them for doing something their families disapproved of, such as dating boys or talking to them on the phone. Or in the case of Aasiya Hassan, for wanting to divorce a man who beat her.

A growing number of Muslim "honor killings" occur in the West.

In 2008, Chaudhry Rashid, a Pakistani immigrant who lived in Georgia, strangled his daughter because she wanted to divorce her husband, whom she was forced to marry as part of an arranged Islamic marriage.

Also last year, Yaser Said, an Egyptian living in Dallas, shot and killed both of his teenage daughters, Amina and Sarah, because they wanted to date non-Muslim boys.

In 2007, Muhammad Parvez, a Muslim immigrant in Canada, strangled his 16-year-old daughter with a hijab, the Muslim headscarf, because she refused to wear one.

Pamella Geller's blog Atlas Shrugs contains, in addition to information on Muslim honor killings, which are largely ignored or covered up in the American press, a haunting collection of photographs of Muslim women, most of them very young, whose relatives murdered them for bringing "shame" to their families and to Islam, the religion of peace.

Under the strict Islamic code known as sharia, which is the law of the land in many Muslim countries, honor killings are legal.

In October 2006, a guest on Muzzammil Hassan's Bridges TV said Muslims have a duty to change America, and he recommended that sharia law be recognized in U.S. courts.

CHUCK HUSTMYRE is an award winning crime reporter and the author of the Penguin true crime books Killer with a Badge and An Act of Kindness, and the novel House of the Rising Sun. For more information, visit http://www.chuckhustmyre.com/.

Sphere: Related Content
read more “My Bloody Muslim Valentine”

Inside Job?

February 12, 2009

By Chuck Hustmyre

Another day, another missing child in Florida. Sadly, it's getting almost routine.

This time it's 5-year-old Haleigh Cummings of Satsuma, Fla., 85 miles north of Orlando, where 2-year-old Caylee Anthony was murdered last summer.

Haleigh Cummings looks like she was sent over from Central Casting. The kindergartener has long, curly blond hair and a smile so sweet it could melt stone.

Then there's the supporting cast. The father, 24-year-old Ronald Cummings, a crane operator, and his 17-year-old girlfriend, Misty Croslin, with whom he shares his doublewide trailer.

There's California bounty hunter and publicity prostitute Leonard Padilla, who caught the first flight to central Florida to offer a $25,000 reward and to sign autographs, as he did a few weeks ago in the Caylee Anthony case.

And, of course, Greta and Nancy Grace are on the case, cashing in on another ratings bonanza.
The story began early Tuesday.

Ronald Cummings says it's not uncommon for him to work until 3 a.m., which is what he was doing Tuesday morning when his daughter disappeared.

While at work, Ronald left his two children, Haleigh and her younger brother, Ronald Jr., with Misty, whom he's been seeing for a few months.

Misty, who's not old enough to vote, and who -- based on her age -- either hasn't yet finished high school or dropped out, says she put Haleigh to bed around 10 p.m. When Misty got up around 3 a.m. to use the bathroom, she discovered the back door of the trailer was open and Haleigh was missing.

The little girl's mother, Crystal Sheffield, who apparently lost or surrendered custody of her children, lives out of town, but has returned to Satsuma and is cooperating with sheriff's detectives, according to press reports.

Conspiracy kooks who believe that Casey Anthony, the mother of murdered Caylee, is innocent and that her bizarre story about a vanishing nanny is true, have, I'm sure, already linked Haleigh's disappearance to Caylee's murder and concocted at least half a dozen implausible, nay impossible, scenarios to account for both cases.

However, those of us who are burdened with more conventional thinking will likely look closer to home for the Haleigh Cummings culprit.

I know it's happened before, the Polly Klaas case is one such example, but it's rare that someone can break into an occupied home in the middle of the night, snatch a child from her bed without anyone noticing, and then disappear.

That is what we have been asked to believe for all these years in the JonBenet Ramsey case, and I, for one, just don't buy it.

Unless there's compelling evidence to the contrary, I always suspect an inside job when a child turns up missing. There are a lot of perverts in the world -- 44 registered sex offenders live within a five-mile radius of the Cummings's trailer -- but you've got to have nerves of steel to break into the trailer of a roughneck like Ronald Cummings in the middle of the night when you know someone is home and you know there's likely a gun in the house. (Cummings later told police he has a Beretta 9mm pistol.)

In this case, the circumstances seem peculiar. The father is gone until 3 a.m., near the exact time his love pet discovers the little girl missing. Yet, from press reports, she didn't call 911 right away. She waited until her boyfriend got home.

Cummings told police, his "dumb bitch girlfriend" told him Haleigh was missing when he came in from work.

And what's with the brick? Misty confused the 911 operator when she kept mentioning the brick. Apparently, the trailer's back door, which Ronald said he kept locked and was rarely used, was open and the screen door was propped open with a brick.

I can see an argument that a burglar might have propped open the screen door to keep it from banging against the house, but it smells a bit staged to me.

I'm also a tad suspicious of Misty's description of Haleigh during her 911 call as "my daughter." In the background, and later when talking to the 911 operator, Ronald sounds genuinely upset. He threatens to kill the person who took his daughter, even if it means spending the rest of his life in prison. Misty sounds upset too, but there's something else there I can't quite put my finger on yet.

Were I a betting man, I'd lay money she knows more than she's said so far.

We'll see.

###

CHUCK HUSTMYRE is an award winning crime reporter and the author of the Penguin true crime books Killer with a Badge and An Act of Kindness, and the novel House of the Rising Sun. For more information, visit www.chuckhustmyre.com.

Sphere: Related Content
read more “Inside Job?”

By Chuck Hustmyre

Barry Seal was one of the biggest drug smugglers of the 1980s. By his own estimation, he made $50 million smuggling cocaine for the Medellin Cartel. In 1986, he was assassinated in Baton Rouge, La. by a Colombian hit men sent by Pablo Escobar and Jorge Ochoa.

Here is a link to my just published truTV feature story on Barry Seal.

SMUGGLER: Barry Seal

Sphere: Related Content
read more “DRUG SMUGGLER: The fast life and violent death of Barry Seal”

Justice for Jason?

January 15, 2009

By Chuck Hustmyre

Little Jason Midyette was just 10 weeks old when someone beat him to death.

Jason's 27 bone fractures included both arms, both legs, nine ribs, a collarbone, his feet and hands, and his skull. Inside his tiny head, Jason's brain was bruised, bleeding, and swollen.

He died in Denver on March 3, 2006. The likely culprits, his parents -- Alex and Molly Midyette.

In December 2007, Molly was convicted of failing to provide her newborn son with adequate medical care, not for actually abusing him. Molly Midyette is now doing 16 years in prison.

The U.S. Constitution requires that our legal system grant Alex Midyette, son of wealthy Boulder real estate icon J. Nold Midyette, the presumption of innocence. Yet we know to a legal certainty that his wife stood by and let her son suffer after someone inflicted horrible injuries on him.

Who could that someone be?

Alex and Molly had no other children. The young couple lived alone with their son outside Boulder. On the day they took Jason to the hospital, Molly had been at work and Alex had been home watching Jason.

Since her conviction, Molly has claimed she was threatened by Alex and his lawyer and cowed into silence, not allowed to tell the truth about her abusive husband.

Molly may be called as a witness in Alex's trial, prosecutors have said.

Jury selection has been going on all week. Opening arguments may begin as early as today, perhaps Friday.

Now we will see what money and influence can buy.

The previous Boulder County DA, Mary Lacy -- she of JonBennet Ramsey infamy -- dragged her feet as long as possible on this case. It was only after I started writing about the case for the old CourtTV Web site CrimeLibrary.com and made appearances on The O'Reilly Factor and The Line-up on Fox News that any progress was made on the case.

After about a year of "investigating," Mary Lacy still could not find anyone to charge with murder. The most serious charge she could come up with was child abuse. I think her working hypothesis was that Jason beat himself to death and his parents were only guilty of being a little slow to take him to the doctor.

Based on recent press accounts, Alex's legal dream team is still floating the idea that the dozens of broken bones his son suffered were the result of some rare disease. The coroner and a team of university experts have already ruled out what's known as brittle bone syndrome, so I guess it's up to Alex's lawyers to "discover" a new bone disease.

For enough money, I am sure they'll come up with something. And money shouldn't be a problem.

Old man Midyette owns a fair-sized chunk of downtown Boulder, worth an estimated $80 million (in pre-real estate market crash dollars).

Wouldn't it be an ironic travesty if Alex were acquitted of the actual abuse that led to Jason's death and Molly, who probably didn't do anything more than fail to protect her son, gets left holding the bag and rotting in jail?

With jury selection almost done, the question remains, nearly three years after his death, will there be justice for Jason?

CHUCK HUSTMYRE is an award winning crime reporter and the author of the Penguin true crime books Killer with a Badge and An Act of Kindness, and the novel House of the Rising Sun. For more information, visit www.chuckhustmyre.com.

Sphere: Related Content
read more “Justice for Jason?”

Denying The Obvious

December 11, 2008

By Chuck Hustmyre

The philosophical principle known as Ockham's Razor proposes that the simplest explanation is usually the best. The razor part of William of Ockham's principle is a metaphor used to slice away unnecessary considerations, to reduce a situation to its core in order to explain it.

In other words, if it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck.

In criminal cases, especially high-profile ones, an awful lot of people tend to lose their common sense and are overcome by some type of mass delusion. They don't believe in ducks.

I blame fiction writers for the phenomenon. They always throw in some surprise twist at the end that clears the one guy and proves the guilt of some sap we didn't even suspect.

In real life, things almost never work out like that. Perhaps that's why they call it fiction. In real criminal investigations, the most obvious suspect, the person all the evidence points to, most often did it. That's why all the evidence points to him, or in some cases, to her.

The so-called alternative theories are usually ridiculous, yet people cling to them despite overwhelming and often obvious evidence to the contrary.

A certain segment of the population still believes that O.J. Simpson did not kill his ex-wife, that Lee Harvey Oswald -- a Marine sharpshooter -- couldn't have made the shot that killed President Kennedy, that Dick Cheney bombed the twin towers, that the Egyptians couldn't have built the pyramids without extra-terrestrial help.

And it's happening again in Orlando, Florida, in the case Caylee Anthony, a 2-year-old who disappeared in June. Her mother, Casey Anthony, said she spent the first month after Caylee went missing conducting her own "investigation" into her daughter's disappearance. Later, it came out that Casey took some time off from her investigation to move in with a new boyfriend, get a tattoo, go shopping, and party at a local nightclub. Finally, when Casey's own mother forced her to notify law enforcement that her daughter was missing, Casey concocted a story so outlandish that it would have been laughable had it not it meant that little Caylee was probably dead.

According to Casey she dropped her daughter off with her nanny on her way to Universal Studios, where she worked as an event planner. When she returned several hours later, neither the nanny nor Caylee were there. She got a call three days later from the nanny, but the woman would not tell Casey where her daughter was. A month later, she got a call from Caylee, but the little girl didn't say anything about where she was or what had happened to her. Not once did Casey call the police to report any of this.

When sheriff's detectives got involved, they unraveled Casey's story within hours. She didn't work at Universal Studios. The nanny didn't live in the apartment where Casey said she lived. Casey couldn't provide the detectives with the nanny's phone number or the name of anyone who had ever met her. During the month Caylee had been missing, Casey hadn't told any of her friends, her boyfriend, or her parents about the baby's disappearance.

The local crime lab and the FBI crime lab found evidence that the trunk of Casey's car had recently held a decomposing human body, and they found traces of the knockout drug chloroform.

A Florida grand jury has indicted 22-year-old Casey Anthony for first-degree murder, yet in our modern American culture of victimhood, Casey, at least in a lot of people's minds, is as much a victim as her missing daughter.

Since Caylee was last seen, people have been inventing fantastic explanations for her disappearance. Most of the explanations focus on Casey's former boyfriends, some on her parents, and some on the shadowy world of baby sellers.

Rumors and speculation swirl around Casey's former fiancé, an ex-Orlando cop, but he has a DNA test that proves he is not Caylee's father.

Without a shred of evidence, some theorize that Caylee was kidnapped and sold. Others point the finger at Casey's father, George Anthony. This week, those who chose to believe that Caylee is still alive focused on video of a little girl who resembled Caylee in a mall play area.

As late as Wednesday night, Cindy Anthony, Casey's mother -- although she is the one who called the police -- claimed her daughter had nothing to do with Caylee's disappearance. Incredibly, Cindy blames the sheriff's office for not trying to find Caylee. She says Casey is sitting in jail and not cooperating because she is trying to protect Caylee (probably from the baby sellers who have her.)

"Someone has her daughter," Cindy said recently. "I know Caylee is alive."

Likewise, George Anthony told a TV interviewer he's positive, despite all the lies, that Casey was not involved in Caylee's disappearance. "She's a great mom," he said.

Thursday morning, a water company meter reader in Orlando stumbled across the remains of a little girl in a plastic trash bag one-quarter mile from the Anthony home. Investigators believe they've finally found Caylee.

People are, of course, free to believe what they want, and being a kook is not a crime. In fact, I have a few of my own pet theories about certain things that might fall into the kook fringe, but to paraphrase Hamlet, I know a duck from a handsaw, and when I see a duck and hear a duck, I'm not afraid to call it a duck.

For a detailed look at this case, see my three-part series at truTV's Crime Library.

###

CHUCK HUSTMYRE is a retired federal agent and a full-time crime writer. He lives near New Orleans.

Sphere: Related Content
read more “Denying The Obvious”

By Chuck Hustmyre

Thirteen years.

That is how long Antoinette Frank has sat on Louisiana's death row. Thirteen years is how long the jury's verdict has been stayed. Thirteen years is how long justice has been denied for Ha and Cuong Vu and Ronnie Williams -- all cut down in the prime of their lives.

And that's too long.

Two weeks ago, the Louisiana Supreme Court decided to give the ex-New Orleans cop yet more time for yet more appeals, canceling her Dec. 8 execution date. It was the third time the state Supreme Court has canceled a death warrant for Frank.

Enough is enough. It's time the state enforce the legal sentence jurors handed down to Antoinette Frank and her murderous cohort, Rogers LaCaze, in 1995 -- that they be put to death by lethal injection.

Frank is the former New Orleans police officer who teamed up with a diminutive crack cocaine dealer to rob a family-owned Vietnamese restaurant in eastern New Orleans. While inside the restaurant, where Frank was well known because she had been working an off-duty security detail there every week for more than a year, the dim-witted duo, neither of whom wore a mask, shot and killed a uniformed New Orleans police officer and two restaurant workers, a brother and sister who were part of the family that owned the restaurant.

Officer Ronnie Williams was 25, married and the father of two young sons. Ha Vu was 24 and wanted to become a Catholic nun. Cuong Vu was just 17.

Another pair of Vu siblings survived the shooting rampage. Chau Vu and her brother Quoc hid inside a cooler as Frank and LaCaze tore through the restaurant looking for cash and for the two survivors, whom they had somehow let slip from their sight.

Both Chau and Quoc testified in court that seconds after Frank and LaCaze entered the restaurant, which had already closed for the night, Frank herded all four of the Vu kids into the kitchen. LaCaze and Officer Williams were the only ones in the dinning room when gunshots exploded from that direction. Williams was later found shot to death in the dinning room.

When the sound of the shots distracted Frank, Chau and Quoc ducked into the cooler. Chau motioned for Ha and Cuong to follow, but they refused to budge. They remained frozen with fear inside the cramped kitchen.

Frank later admitted to detectives that she shot Ha and Cuong as they knelt on the kitchen floor. She pumped nine rounds from a semiautomatic pistol into their bodies. Ha died instantly; Cuong suffered some. Frank later told detectives that when Cuong collapsed on the floor, "he kept mumbling something." So she shot him again. Still, the 17 year old refused to die, so Frank fell back on her police training and "double tapped" him, firing two quick shots into his brain.

Even if you throw out all reason and common sense and accept Frank's story that she only shot Ha and Cuong Vu as they knelt at her feet because LaCaze was threatening to kill her if she didn't, why was she so thorough? Why shoot them nine times, with multiple shots to their heads?

As a trained police officer with a loaded gun in her hand, why didn't she turn on LaCaze and send him to hell rather than murder two innocent people? Why not signal to Officer Ronnie Williams, with whom Frank worked every day, that LaCaze was there to rob the restaurant? A simple police code would have done the trick? Something like, "He's here for a 64," or "He's got a 95." It was something Ronnie Williams would have understood instantly and LaCaze would not have understood at all.

The reason is simple: Frank was there to rob the restaurant and murder all the witnesses -- including her fellow police officer. After the robbery and murders, she dropped LaCaze off and returned to the restaurant to find Chau and Quoc and finish the job. The responding officers arrested Frank at the scene, armed with another gun.

Thirteen years ago, in separate trials, two New Orleans juries ordered that Frank and LaCaze be put to death for their crimes. Frank's case has been to the state Supreme Court and back. The U.S. Supreme Court has refused to hear it. Frank's attorney, an anti-death penalty activist, has promised a whole new round of delays. "We are just starting the post-conviction appeal," he told The Times-Picayune.

It's been 13 years. Enough is enough. Let the jury's sentence be carried out. Execute this monster and be done with it.

For more details about this horrendous crime and how Frank became a police officer in the first place, read my book Killer with a Badge.

Sphere: Related Content
read more “Antoinette Frank -- enough is enough”

By Chuck Hustmyre

Maybe the discussion of this country's immigration policy should be about more than all of those millions of hard-working "undocumented workers," gladly toiling away at thankless jobs that Americans won't do anymore.

Maybe we should stray beyond the immigration lobby's guidelines and talking points and discuss the cost of illegal immigration in terms of human lives, specifically American lives.

On Oct. 30, the subject of illegal immigration became much more than an academic discussion among policy wonks for the families of Wallace Gomez, 78, his kid brother, Beuford Gomez, 75, and two geriatric afternoon cocktail drinkers at Gomez's Bar just across the river from New Orleans.

According to police, five men entered the bar and ordered drinks. A few minutes later, the five men pulled pistols and herded the Gomez brothers, the employees, and all of the customers into the back of the bar, where they robbed them of their wallets, cash, and valuables. As the gunmen were leaving, they shot and killed Wallace and Beuford Gomez and two customers, Wayne Hebert, 64, and Jeffrey Camardelle, 71.

Another Gomez brother, 83-year-old Stanley Gomez, was in the bar when the shooting started. "They had bullets flying all over the place," he told The Times-Picayune. "I saw my youngest brother get shot, and then I saw my oldest brother get shot."

Quick responding deputies with the Jefferson Parish Sheriff's Office captured three of the robbers outside the bar as they were trying to get away, one of whom had been shot several times, apparently in an exchange of gunfire with 78-year-old Wallace. U.S. Marshals captured the other two suspects last week in Texas.

Two of the alleged killers are from El Salvador; the other three are from Honduras.

According to a source I spoke with who is familiar with the investigation, none of the five speak English. "We had to use translators with all of them," the source said.

So far the immigration status of the five suspects has not been released, a fact that should tell you a lot. According to the same source, at least two of the gunmen are in this country illegally. More likely, judging by the fact that they were all involved in armed robbery and murder together, and none of them speak English, all five will probably turn out to be illegals.

I guess they couldn't find jobs that Americans would no longer do, so they decided to kill four Americans to make some room in the tight job market.

A lawyer friend of mine tried to downplay the illegal alien angle. "It's not like American criminals have never robbed a bar and killed people," he said.

True, but if we had a real strategy in place to stop illegal immigration, those two (more likely five) illegals wouldn't have been in Marrero, La. the day before Halloween and the Gomez brothers would still be alive. Ditto for Wayne Hebert and Jeffrey Camardelle.

But it's worse than that, worse than just not having effective policy and procedures in place to stop foreigners from coming into this country illegally. We have local government officials actively working to thwart the federal government's efforts to enforce the hodgepodge of laws we do have on the books.

They are called "sanctuary cities," meaning they are sanctuaries for illegal aliens. In more than 30 U.S. cities, cities like New York, Chicago, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Houston, and Washington, D.C., city employees, including police officers, are forbidden from asking the people they contact in the course of their duties any questions regarding their immigration status.

In those "enlightened" cities, the cops can't enforce or cooperate with the enforcement of federal immigration laws. Does that make sense? Would it be equally "enlightened" if those cities also prevented the local cops from pursuing bank robbers, Internet con artists, and interstate stolen car traffickers -- federal crimes all?

According to an article on HumanEvents.com, Amanda B. Carpenter wrote that in 2007 Washington D.C. Police Chief Charles H. Ramsey wrote in a memo:

"MPD [Metropolitan Police Department] officers are strictly prohibited from making inquiries into citizenship or residency status for the purpose of determining whether an individual has violated the civil immigration laws or for the purpose of enforcing those laws ... the MPD is not in the business of inquiring about the residency status of the people we serve and is not in the business of enforcing civil immigration laws."

Also in 2007, San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom condemned a raid by federal authorities on a local business that netted 13 illegal aliens. According to the same Human Events article, the mayor said:

"I will not allow any of my department heads or anyone associated with this city to cooperate in any way shape or form with these raids. We are a sanctuary city, make no mistake about it."

I'm not against immigration. I'm against illegal immigration. I'm opposed to people slipping into this country without leaving a paper trail. I'm opposed to people who use our system of social services without contributing to it. I'm opposed to people who work here but pay no taxes. And I'm opposed to people who, because they are undocumented, commit murder in this country and then disappear across the border, leaving no trace of their existence other than the blood spilled from their victims.

Jessica Vaughn of the Center for Immigration Studies, an independent, nonprofit research organization, estimated there are 15,000 illegal alien gang members in the United States. She said that between 2005 and 2007, federal immigration agents arrested 134 illegal alien gang members whose criminal histories included charges of murder, attempted murder, or manslaughter.

There are Web sites devoted to documenting the cases of Americans murdered by illegal immigrants. Many of the victims have been police officers, some of whom worked in "sanctuary cities."

Even as these citizens and police officers were being killed, certain segments of our country were lobbying, and continue to lobby today, for even more lenient border controls and less enforcement of our laws.

I spent 20 years in law enforcement. I know there is no way to stop every crime, but we stop the ones we can. And one way to stop some of them is to clamp down on our borders by developing strong, effective enforcement policies, procedures, and techniques.

I bet the Gomez family would agree.

Chuck Hustmyre is the author of the Penguin true crime books Killer with a Badge and An Act of Kindness, and the novel House of the Rising Sun. He lives in Baton Rouge, La., where he rides his Harley-Davidson and is hard at work on a new crime novel.

Sphere: Related Content
read more “ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS MURDER FOUR IN NEW ORLEANS-AREA BAR”

by Chuck Hustmyre

It's official. New Orleans is a third-world cesspool. Ranked by Foreign Policy magazine as one of the five "murder capitals of the world," New Orleans "remains the most deadly in the United States," according to the magazine's Web site.

Although the New Orleans Police Department and the FBI don't agree on the exact number, the murder rate in New Orleans is roughly 10 times the national average.

In 2007 there were 210 murders in New Orleans. So far this year, at least 151 bodies have been scraped off the pavement.

The disagreement is not over the number of murders (although in New Orleans, sometimes even counting the bodies has proven confusing), but rather over the murder rate, which is the number of murders per 100,000 residents.

The murder rate is calculated by dividing the city's population by 100,000, and then dividing the number of murders by that first figure.

And as Hamlet would say, "Ay, there's the rub."

The city disagrees with just about everyone on the number of people who've come back to New Orleans since Hurricane Katrina. The U.S. Census Bureau says New Orleans had 240,000 residents in 2007. The FBI uses 220,000. The mayor of New Orleans, Ray "Chocolate City" Nagin, claims a population of more than 300,000.

The FBI pegged the 2007 murder rate in New Orleans at a staggering 95 killings per 100,000 people.

But even if you use the mayor's unsupported population figure of 312,000 residents, that's still 67 murders per 100,000 people. The national average is around seven.

By comparison, the FBI puts the 2007 per capita murder rate for Detroit at 44, Philadelphia at 27, Chicago at 15, and Los Angeles at just 10.

This week in New Orleans, five people were murdered in less than 36 hours.

In addition to New Orleans, the other cities in Foreign Policy's rogue's gallery of murder are Caracas, Venezuela; Cape Town, South Africa; Moscow, Russia; and Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea.

According to the magazine, these cities "stand in a class all their own when it comes to brutal, homicidal violence."

Yet, even among these five killing capitals, only Caracas had a higher murder rate than New Orleans.

In part, the magazine blames "grinding poverty, an inadequate school system, a prevalence of public housing, and a high incarceration rate" for New Orleans' world-class murder rate.

What the magazine didn't mention was that the city is run by crooks and charlatans. The mayor can't keep his foot out of his mouth long enough to complete a sentence and his only skill set seems to be begging the federal government for more money. The DA was forced to quit last year because he was an incompetent boob. The city's U.S. Congressman, Bill "What's that money doing in my freezer?" Jefferson, is under federal indictment. A well-known local political hack reported to federal prison this week to begin a five-year stretch for his part in a million dollar city contract skim ...

In New Orleans, nothing ever changes. So as they say in the Big Easy, Laissez les bon temps roulez. (Let the good times roll.)

CHUCK HUSTMYRE is the author of the Penguin true crime books Killer with a Badge and An Act of Kindness, and the novel House of the Rising Sun. He lives in Baton Rouge, La., where he rides his Harley-Davidson and is hard at work on a new crime novel.

Sphere: Related Content
read more “NEW ORLEANS: "THE MOST DEADLY CITY"”

In Cold Blog is a true crime blog founded by best selling author Corey Mitchell, and is written by award winning journalists, authors, criminal justice professionals and others.

Click to...

Join Our Fan Page on Facebook!

Site Archive

Share Us With Friends!

Subscribe


Subscribe to Our Feed

Follow us on Twitter

Get New ICB Posts by Email:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Today's Featured News & Posts

Our Recent Articles

Blogumulus by Roy Tanck and Amanda FazaniDistributed by CahayaBiru.com
.
.